An aside since I’m yammering. I never understood BD’s objection to Cavallero’s chocolate Jesus display. It seemed obvious to me that it was motivated by the same sentiment as (if it wasn’t a direct rip-off of) Richard Manderson’s earlier works. According to Wikipedia, Manderson felt that the religious sentiment behind Easter had been overshadowed and the holiday had become a “rather ugly period of over consumption.” Seems like the kind of message that someone who cared about the Christian religion could get on board with — but that’d have to be someone who wasn’t suffering from fatwa envy.

Well, leave the Buddhists alone, I hear they’re really aggressive.

let me show you the end results of this particular *ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENTIFIC MODE*
of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely divorced from
any human objectives…

this style has been perfected by dawkins, pz, randi and the other *NEW ATHEISTS*
**
THE BOOBQUAKE – 911!
***
hey, atheists don’t even BELIEVE IN BOOBIES!!!
they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:
jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE….

blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION – THAT
OF LIBERATION – not just merely harmless expression…

Visit for the BOOBQUAKE:

dissidentphilosophy.lifediscussion.net/philosophy-f1/the-boobquake-911-t1310.htm

***************************************************

FSM….

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

i766.photobucket.com/albums/xx302/AtheismPics/fsmlogo.png

*****************************

DOUBLE!

FOR THE WIN…

I assume he’ll also ask them for their support in his stance to get the Muhammad depiction uncensored.