<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Anti-Vaccine Activists Kill Two Children in California	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michael, you are a dangrous moron.  Let me tell you a few things you will deny or ignore, and finish with a message you can&#039;t ignore.

Diseases like small pox, measles, mumps, polio, and so on are transmitted from one person to another via some process that varies from disease to disease. The &quot;germ theory&quot; is not a myth.  And, Oswald shot Kennedy and there really was a Holocaust.  

Vaccines are not perfect ... some are quite close to 100% effective, but others (many others) are far from that.  An individual may receive very little protection, the protection can &quot;wear off&quot; or a version of the disease may be out there that the vaccine does not affect as well as others.  It is not as simple as &quot;if you take a vaccine, and your family does, then you are safe, no matter what others do.&quot;  Vaccination addresses disease at a population and ecological level. By refusing vaccination, you endanger everyone else for indefensible, stupid reasons.  

Many people who get very upset about vaccinations are young, stupid, or poorly educated in history.  They do not know what it is like to live in a world where seasonal (or non seasonal) widespread death comes to a neighborhood.  They do not know the experience of hearing, in a few days time, that one child, then another, then another, so maybe  six or eight of the dozen in your neighborhood, all have rubella, and then wondering if any of them will die. It is a little like hearing that a van of your neighbor&#039;s school kids, along with your own, was in a serious accident but you don&#039;t have details yet.  You wait to see if any will be reported dead.

You don&#039;t know what that is like.  I do.  I don&#039;t want your stupidity to make the world go to that place ever again.  

And that&#039;s a normal run of the mill year, every single year, not an epidemic year.  

Vaccinations have changed the world so that this sort of thing simply does not happen any more.  You are trying to bring that back.  

There are a lot of people who are not smart enough to protect themselves, let along to participate in the societal level protection that is required.  One can argue until the cows come home as to whether or not there is a legal or constitutional right to push vaccines on people.  The simple fact is that those who refuse vaccines are risking all of us.  And we will defend ourselves.  If you think I&#039;m going to send my children to a school with a large number of anti-vaxers during some neo-epidemic caused by those very anti-vaxers stupidly then you are quite mistaken.  In the event of a dangerous epidemic, the law is very flexible in this way.  Kids who are not vaccinated, as well as adults, will be forced to vaccinate if necessary or simply be quarantined. You and your children will be kept out of schools, public places, or jailed, as needed.  

In the meantime, between epidemics, the screechy ignorant anti-vaxers merely look like idiots.  Which is what they are.

By the way, I see the primary use of the second amendment in this country as not defending myself against some mythical government.  I see it as my first line of defense in the case of the epidemic.  Picking off the unvaccinated. Oh yes, I can have my fantasies too.  

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you are a dangrous moron.  Let me tell you a few things you will deny or ignore, and finish with a message you can&#8217;t ignore.</p>
<p>Diseases like small pox, measles, mumps, polio, and so on are transmitted from one person to another via some process that varies from disease to disease. The &#8220;germ theory&#8221; is not a myth.  And, Oswald shot Kennedy and there really was a Holocaust.  </p>
<p>Vaccines are not perfect &#8230; some are quite close to 100% effective, but others (many others) are far from that.  An individual may receive very little protection, the protection can &#8220;wear off&#8221; or a version of the disease may be out there that the vaccine does not affect as well as others.  It is not as simple as &#8220;if you take a vaccine, and your family does, then you are safe, no matter what others do.&#8221;  Vaccination addresses disease at a population and ecological level. By refusing vaccination, you endanger everyone else for indefensible, stupid reasons.  </p>
<p>Many people who get very upset about vaccinations are young, stupid, or poorly educated in history.  They do not know what it is like to live in a world where seasonal (or non seasonal) widespread death comes to a neighborhood.  They do not know the experience of hearing, in a few days time, that one child, then another, then another, so maybe  six or eight of the dozen in your neighborhood, all have rubella, and then wondering if any of them will die. It is a little like hearing that a van of your neighbor&#8217;s school kids, along with your own, was in a serious accident but you don&#8217;t have details yet.  You wait to see if any will be reported dead.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know what that is like.  I do.  I don&#8217;t want your stupidity to make the world go to that place ever again.  </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a normal run of the mill year, every single year, not an epidemic year.  </p>
<p>Vaccinations have changed the world so that this sort of thing simply does not happen any more.  You are trying to bring that back.  </p>
<p>There are a lot of people who are not smart enough to protect themselves, let along to participate in the societal level protection that is required.  One can argue until the cows come home as to whether or not there is a legal or constitutional right to push vaccines on people.  The simple fact is that those who refuse vaccines are risking all of us.  And we will defend ourselves.  If you think I&#8217;m going to send my children to a school with a large number of anti-vaxers during some neo-epidemic caused by those very anti-vaxers stupidly then you are quite mistaken.  In the event of a dangerous epidemic, the law is very flexible in this way.  Kids who are not vaccinated, as well as adults, will be forced to vaccinate if necessary or simply be quarantined. You and your children will be kept out of schools, public places, or jailed, as needed.  </p>
<p>In the meantime, between epidemics, the screechy ignorant anti-vaxers merely look like idiots.  Which is what they are.</p>
<p>By the way, I see the primary use of the second amendment in this country as not defending myself against some mythical government.  I see it as my first line of defense in the case of the epidemic.  Picking off the unvaccinated. Oh yes, I can have my fantasies too.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Smith		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg or someone above, you said below people &quot;get&quot; infections from other people.  HOW DOES THAT SCIENTIFICALLY TAKE PLACE?  Let&#039;s get into this. Michael Smith  msmith6791 at AOL

NOTE: I have typed below what I read above by Greg or someone. So I hope I get some answers. While we are waiting we can all research this.  You can GOOGLE: Germ Theory of Disease and get some links to study.  You can GOOGLE: Myth of Germ theory of disease and get some good articles PRO AND CON.  Here&#039;s a good one on fraud of germ theory:  http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/222567/why_do_we_get_sick_myth_of_the_germ.html?cat=5

YOU SAID or someone said:Greg, you airplane inspection analogy is not apt. Airplane crashes are (in general) independent from each other. Infections are never independent. Each infection results from someone catching the infection from someone who is infected. 

Infections require both susceptible individuals and infected individuals. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg or someone above, you said below people &#8220;get&#8221; infections from other people.  HOW DOES THAT SCIENTIFICALLY TAKE PLACE?  Let&#8217;s get into this. Michael Smith  msmith6791 at AOL</p>
<p>NOTE: I have typed below what I read above by Greg or someone. So I hope I get some answers. While we are waiting we can all research this.  You can GOOGLE: Germ Theory of Disease and get some links to study.  You can GOOGLE: Myth of Germ theory of disease and get some good articles PRO AND CON.  Here&#8217;s a good one on fraud of germ theory:  <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/222567/why_do_we_get_sick_myth_of_the_germ.html?cat=5" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/222567/why_do_we_get_sick_myth_of_the_germ.html?cat=5</a></p>
<p>YOU SAID or someone said:Greg, you airplane inspection analogy is not apt. Airplane crashes are (in general) independent from each other. Infections are never independent. Each infection results from someone catching the infection from someone who is infected. </p>
<p>Infections require both susceptible individuals and infected individuals. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Smith		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have followed this article and the vaccine and anti-vaccine issue.  My only question (and comment0 to everyone is this: If you believe vaccines are helpful, DO put a lot of energy into informing people and DO attempt to persuade them to get they and they children vaccinated.  But answer this, where is your right or anyone&#039;s right individually or collectively (i.e.,  a so-called government) to FORCE people to take vaccines or have their children vaccinated against their will?  Where is the power and authority to do that?  Upon what political-religious idea does someone have the right to BY FORCE make someone have a vaccine.  Can you help me understand that?  That&#039;s a comment and a question.  NOW - if YOU are vaccinated and you faccine your children, aren&#039;t you safe?  So if you ARE vaccinated and SAFE, why do you feel you have a right to FORCE your beliefs on others and their children?  You&#039;re safe aren&#039;t you?  So, answer this: why do you NOT leave other people alone?  Hope we get some answers here. Thanks  Michael Smith  msmith6791 at AOL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have followed this article and the vaccine and anti-vaccine issue.  My only question (and comment0 to everyone is this: If you believe vaccines are helpful, DO put a lot of energy into informing people and DO attempt to persuade them to get they and they children vaccinated.  But answer this, where is your right or anyone&#8217;s right individually or collectively (i.e.,  a so-called government) to FORCE people to take vaccines or have their children vaccinated against their will?  Where is the power and authority to do that?  Upon what political-religious idea does someone have the right to BY FORCE make someone have a vaccine.  Can you help me understand that?  That&#8217;s a comment and a question.  NOW &#8211; if YOU are vaccinated and you faccine your children, aren&#8217;t you safe?  So if you ARE vaccinated and SAFE, why do you feel you have a right to FORCE your beliefs on others and their children?  You&#8217;re safe aren&#8217;t you?  So, answer this: why do you NOT leave other people alone?  Hope we get some answers here. Thanks  Michael Smith  msmith6791 at AOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DuWayne		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DuWayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes Scott, they are your children and you should have the right to refuse to vaccinate them, just like I should have the right to make certain that other children, such as my own, are never exposed to them. If you don&#039;t want to vaccinate your children, keep them the fuck away from my kids and especially keep them away from kids who either couldn&#039;t be vaccinated due to other health issues (hint: these are generally kids who are most in need of herd immunity) and kids who never managed to develop the anti-bodies (hint 2: these kids tend to be right behind the kids mentioned above in need of herd immunity).

You just take full advantage of your rights, just don&#039;t infringe on mine while you do so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Scott, they are your children and you should have the right to refuse to vaccinate them, just like I should have the right to make certain that other children, such as my own, are never exposed to them. If you don&#8217;t want to vaccinate your children, keep them the fuck away from my kids and especially keep them away from kids who either couldn&#8217;t be vaccinated due to other health issues (hint: these are generally kids who are most in need of herd immunity) and kids who never managed to develop the anti-bodies (hint 2: these kids tend to be right behind the kids mentioned above in need of herd immunity).</p>
<p>You just take full advantage of your rights, just don&#8217;t infringe on mine while you do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Yet your still not making your argument against say... mercury being in these vaccines and the effect it might have on adults, much less children, and why there is some belief, by a growing number of people, that they are tied {yet again that these things have truly occurred to, not theoretically...actually} in close proximity to bad things that have happened,&lt;/em&gt;

I do make that argument.  I&#039;ve read the primary scientific literature on it and there isn&#039;t any evidence that links any aspect of vaccination with autism.  There is a vague,proposed but statistically non comforming co-increase in autism and the use of the mercury, then there is no decrease in autism when the mercury use goes down.  They are unlinked.

Besides, with the exception of some (but not all) influenza vaccines, thimerosal (that&#039;s the stuff with the mercury in it) is not used in most, perhaps any, childhood vaccines.  The typical paranoid deluded antivaxer, yourself for example, avoids even vaccines without mercury because what you&#039;re doing here is not really avoiding mercury.  You are avoiding Big Pharm.

I can see why  Big Pharm would make someone nervous, but the conclusions you have drawn are incorrect, inappropriate, and dangerous. 

&lt;em&gt;I read about mercury. Its not healthy for humans.&lt;/em&gt;

Mercury ingestion or inhalation can be quite bad.  But it is no so simple.  Mercury comes in different forms, and that determines if it is dangerous, and the amount matters. The mercury in vaccines is a very tiny amount and the form it comes in appears to not interact with human tissues.  

One study measured the amount of mercury in the usual tissues (hair, blood, etc) infants and found that the amounts were very very small, and that the amount detected had no relationship to amounts introduced through vaccination.  In other words, there is trace mercury there (in our enviornment, in our diets) and the vaccine-sourced mercury is undetectable as an addition to that, it is so small or even non existent.  That study demonstrated that vaccine-sourced mercury ends up in the diaper. 

I feel icky about mercury being in vaccines, but the truth is that there is somewhere between almost none and zero, and the science shows that it passes harmlessly through owing to the nature of the compound.





  


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Yet your still not making your argument against say&#8230; mercury being in these vaccines and the effect it might have on adults, much less children, and why there is some belief, by a growing number of people, that they are tied {yet again that these things have truly occurred to, not theoretically&#8230;actually} in close proximity to bad things that have happened,</em></p>
<p>I do make that argument.  I&#8217;ve read the primary scientific literature on it and there isn&#8217;t any evidence that links any aspect of vaccination with autism.  There is a vague,proposed but statistically non comforming co-increase in autism and the use of the mercury, then there is no decrease in autism when the mercury use goes down.  They are unlinked.</p>
<p>Besides, with the exception of some (but not all) influenza vaccines, thimerosal (that&#8217;s the stuff with the mercury in it) is not used in most, perhaps any, childhood vaccines.  The typical paranoid deluded antivaxer, yourself for example, avoids even vaccines without mercury because what you&#8217;re doing here is not really avoiding mercury.  You are avoiding Big Pharm.</p>
<p>I can see why  Big Pharm would make someone nervous, but the conclusions you have drawn are incorrect, inappropriate, and dangerous. </p>
<p><em>I read about mercury. Its not healthy for humans.</em></p>
<p>Mercury ingestion or inhalation can be quite bad.  But it is no so simple.  Mercury comes in different forms, and that determines if it is dangerous, and the amount matters. The mercury in vaccines is a very tiny amount and the form it comes in appears to not interact with human tissues.  </p>
<p>One study measured the amount of mercury in the usual tissues (hair, blood, etc) infants and found that the amounts were very very small, and that the amount detected had no relationship to amounts introduced through vaccination.  In other words, there is trace mercury there (in our enviornment, in our diets) and the vaccine-sourced mercury is undetectable as an addition to that, it is so small or even non existent.  That study demonstrated that vaccine-sourced mercury ends up in the diaper. </p>
<p>I feel icky about mercury being in vaccines, but the truth is that there is somewhere between almost none and zero, and the science shows that it passes harmlessly through owing to the nature of the compound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Z		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scott, just a quick question: Which vaccines do you think mercury is in?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, just a quick question: Which vaccines do you think mercury is in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Olsen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Olsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yet your still not making your argument against say... mercury being in these vaccines and the effect it might have on adults, much less children, and why there is some belief, by a growing number of people, that they are tied {yet again that these things have truly occurred to, not theoretically...actually} in close proximity to bad things that have happened, and that when you go to a doctor and they just pull out those vaccines like &quot;of course your going to do this&quot;, and they don&#039;t in any way offer that it is a bit of concern, by, more than one person, this might, possibly, in some way, hurt your child, and that you might want to take a look at all sides of the argument first, before you do something you can&#039;t take back... or believe your &quot;because they said so&quot; argument.  
I read about vaccines they give, mercury was in a lot of them, I read about mercury.  Its not healthy for humans.   I read about the vaccines they put together, some are not necessary to put into an infant, and if that sentiment changes they can be given {without less results or more danger to the person} at older ages than infancy or not together. 
Some people think they have been tied to autism.  I read some information on that side of the argument.  Its seems to be much larger of a concern than I am prepared to risk.  I read about the at risk pool for each individual vaccine and a lot of them were not the enviornment my infant was in, so I chose not to take the risk until the jury wasn&#039;t out anymore, and it was just too coincidental that the one incident I witnessed, happened exactly as many people on the internet had explained happened to them. 
Now I am sorry you don&#039;t agree with me and your stellar argument doesn&#039;t change my mind yet, but buck up...I think I see another sheep coming.  Maybe they will be swayed by your, don&#039;t stay on the point... throw a bunch of mud and smoke... &quot;just listen too me cause I&#039;m smarter cause I have a blog&quot; -isms.   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet your still not making your argument against say&#8230; mercury being in these vaccines and the effect it might have on adults, much less children, and why there is some belief, by a growing number of people, that they are tied {yet again that these things have truly occurred to, not theoretically&#8230;actually} in close proximity to bad things that have happened, and that when you go to a doctor and they just pull out those vaccines like &#8220;of course your going to do this&#8221;, and they don&#8217;t in any way offer that it is a bit of concern, by, more than one person, this might, possibly, in some way, hurt your child, and that you might want to take a look at all sides of the argument first, before you do something you can&#8217;t take back&#8230; or believe your &#8220;because they said so&#8221; argument.<br />
I read about vaccines they give, mercury was in a lot of them, I read about mercury.  Its not healthy for humans.   I read about the vaccines they put together, some are not necessary to put into an infant, and if that sentiment changes they can be given {without less results or more danger to the person} at older ages than infancy or not together.<br />
Some people think they have been tied to autism.  I read some information on that side of the argument.  Its seems to be much larger of a concern than I am prepared to risk.  I read about the at risk pool for each individual vaccine and a lot of them were not the enviornment my infant was in, so I chose not to take the risk until the jury wasn&#8217;t out anymore, and it was just too coincidental that the one incident I witnessed, happened exactly as many people on the internet had explained happened to them.<br />
Now I am sorry you don&#8217;t agree with me and your stellar argument doesn&#8217;t change my mind yet, but buck up&#8230;I think I see another sheep coming.  Maybe they will be swayed by your, don&#8217;t stay on the point&#8230; throw a bunch of mud and smoke&#8230; &#8220;just listen too me cause I&#8217;m smarter cause I have a blog&#8221; -isms.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gwen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think high school health classes, and prenatal classes should include films of infants suffering (and SUFFERING they are) from a case of pertussis. Funny, I have yet to see a parent turn down an anti botulism vaccine for their children with a case of botulism with the  excuse that they are afraid of autism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think high school health classes, and prenatal classes should include films of infants suffering (and SUFFERING they are) from a case of pertussis. Funny, I have yet to see a parent turn down an anti botulism vaccine for their children with a case of botulism with the  excuse that they are afraid of autism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OMG Scott, that comment is a classic.  

I don&#039;t care what you decide or think, but we sane people will do everything in our collective power to force people like you into doing the right thing so today&#039;s infants can grow up in a world without unnecessary epidemics.  

Your attitude is not a matter of opinion, and your paranoid delusions are not a matter of harmless mental illness. What you are saying and doing is harmful to others.  Do you also engage in other antisocial and dangerous practices, such as driving the wrong way on the highway or tossing empty beer bottles out of the third floor window on a busy street? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG Scott, that comment is a classic.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what you decide or think, but we sane people will do everything in our collective power to force people like you into doing the right thing so today&#8217;s infants can grow up in a world without unnecessary epidemics.  </p>
<p>Your attitude is not a matter of opinion, and your paranoid delusions are not a matter of harmless mental illness. What you are saying and doing is harmful to others.  Do you also engage in other antisocial and dangerous practices, such as driving the wrong way on the highway or tossing empty beer bottles out of the third floor window on a busy street? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Olsen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Olsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/04/25/anti-vaccine-activists-kill-tw/#comment-517741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have yet to tell me why you think I should force myself to take the CHANCE.  I know what I&#039;ve seen happen.  Your talking about forcing an infant, whose immune system is brand new, to take some twenty plus injections of foreign substances in the first years of its life and think that can&#039;t possibly have some kind of adverse affects. Just type in mercury and see if it says &quot;not good overall but o.k. to put into children by injection before the age of two&quot;.  Have you actually looked at this stuff?  Not liberal bullshit papres... wikipedia Mercury. So still, the what HAS happened and what HAS NOT happened in MY life still stands.  Your putting in a whole lot of MAYBES so that you can try and force me to feel how you feel cause you made your decision based on words on a page, not REAL HAPPENINGS, so you think you should pressure me and my decision, problem is, I lived mine, it really happened, and you can&#039;t DISPROVE it, so the next best thing is to change the argument and make it about all kinds of other things {i.e. witchdoctor, leukemia, etc.}, because you can&#039;t DISPROVE that something bad might happen, problem also is... they are NOT your kids they are mine.  YET you still think you should make my judgement call, and your opinion doesn&#039;t come from an event that happened in your life.  I saw what happened, studied {out of fear for my own} as much as I could about what might have been the cause, read a lot of stuff from both sides of the argument about vaccinations and what they consist of and prevent, and saw more than once the possible tie to autism and deaths, and felt like it might have something to do with the result, for lack of any other answer.  I made my choice, gave my explanation, you gave no alternative proof but the stock posterchild answer of &quot;they said so thats why&quot;, and tried to prove your argument by loud talk and introduction of other inferred arguments.  Interesting you place your &quot;have to&quot; reasonings in the &quot;be afraid, be very afraid&quot; point of view instead of going &quot;read this and read that&quot; to try and educate me.  The one part of fact you spoke to me  &quot;witch doctor with the leaf and pillow&quot; I took and educated myself with and will now be aware of who lives in the other towns by me.  

P.S.I also read about heavy power lines maybe being a factor in childrens leukemia back in the 80&#039;s and chose not to buy a home that was in the area of heavy power lines, because the guys that said it didn&#039;t hurt you {big electric} don&#039;t live at my house and won&#039;t be affected if its not true.  You can&#039;t take those things {cancer, autism, death from using pharmeceutical drugs properly} away, I get to make my own decision, not sure why you hate that, especially when your arguments ABOUT the subject are &quot;cause they said so&quot;.   
FACT: The WHO said h1n1 was going to be a massive pandemic and put the fear of GOD into all of us that if we didn&#039;t buy it {$bil}and get vaccinated we were all gonna die, then we found out {after the sale w no refund} about the scientist{s} getting paid to do an &quot;impartial&quot; study by the pharm. companies, then the pandemic, by coincidence, didn&#039;t happen.  
FACT: FDA passed the salmonella-chicken guys farm to safely sell eggs, they were bad {people actually died}, they said they cleaned him up... and it happened again a few weeks later... 
FACT: 106,000 people a year die from side effects of drugs after they take them properly.
Why should I believe these people, and not make my own decision through what is true, and what I decide.  I don&#039;t bitch at you for making your decision, I don&#039;t try to influence it, I don&#039;t talk shit about it.  Whose definition of democracy do you subscribe too      ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have yet to tell me why you think I should force myself to take the CHANCE.  I know what I&#8217;ve seen happen.  Your talking about forcing an infant, whose immune system is brand new, to take some twenty plus injections of foreign substances in the first years of its life and think that can&#8217;t possibly have some kind of adverse affects. Just type in mercury and see if it says &#8220;not good overall but o.k. to put into children by injection before the age of two&#8221;.  Have you actually looked at this stuff?  Not liberal bullshit papres&#8230; wikipedia Mercury. So still, the what HAS happened and what HAS NOT happened in MY life still stands.  Your putting in a whole lot of MAYBES so that you can try and force me to feel how you feel cause you made your decision based on words on a page, not REAL HAPPENINGS, so you think you should pressure me and my decision, problem is, I lived mine, it really happened, and you can&#8217;t DISPROVE it, so the next best thing is to change the argument and make it about all kinds of other things {i.e. witchdoctor, leukemia, etc.}, because you can&#8217;t DISPROVE that something bad might happen, problem also is&#8230; they are NOT your kids they are mine.  YET you still think you should make my judgement call, and your opinion doesn&#8217;t come from an event that happened in your life.  I saw what happened, studied {out of fear for my own} as much as I could about what might have been the cause, read a lot of stuff from both sides of the argument about vaccinations and what they consist of and prevent, and saw more than once the possible tie to autism and deaths, and felt like it might have something to do with the result, for lack of any other answer.  I made my choice, gave my explanation, you gave no alternative proof but the stock posterchild answer of &#8220;they said so thats why&#8221;, and tried to prove your argument by loud talk and introduction of other inferred arguments.  Interesting you place your &#8220;have to&#8221; reasonings in the &#8220;be afraid, be very afraid&#8221; point of view instead of going &#8220;read this and read that&#8221; to try and educate me.  The one part of fact you spoke to me  &#8220;witch doctor with the leaf and pillow&#8221; I took and educated myself with and will now be aware of who lives in the other towns by me.  </p>
<p>P.S.I also read about heavy power lines maybe being a factor in childrens leukemia back in the 80&#8217;s and chose not to buy a home that was in the area of heavy power lines, because the guys that said it didn&#8217;t hurt you {big electric} don&#8217;t live at my house and won&#8217;t be affected if its not true.  You can&#8217;t take those things {cancer, autism, death from using pharmeceutical drugs properly} away, I get to make my own decision, not sure why you hate that, especially when your arguments ABOUT the subject are &#8220;cause they said so&#8221;.<br />
FACT: The WHO said h1n1 was going to be a massive pandemic and put the fear of GOD into all of us that if we didn&#8217;t buy it {$bil}and get vaccinated we were all gonna die, then we found out {after the sale w no refund} about the scientist{s} getting paid to do an &#8220;impartial&#8221; study by the pharm. companies, then the pandemic, by coincidence, didn&#8217;t happen.<br />
FACT: FDA passed the salmonella-chicken guys farm to safely sell eggs, they were bad {people actually died}, they said they cleaned him up&#8230; and it happened again a few weeks later&#8230;<br />
FACT: 106,000 people a year die from side effects of drugs after they take them properly.<br />
Why should I believe these people, and not make my own decision through what is true, and what I decide.  I don&#8217;t bitch at you for making your decision, I don&#8217;t try to influence it, I don&#8217;t talk shit about it.  Whose definition of democracy do you subscribe too      </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
