<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;the merge window for 2.6.34 is now open&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Todd		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;But 10.04 will have 2.6.32, not 2.6.33.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you want anything bleeding edge, don&#039;t use Ubuntu.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But 10.04 will have 2.6.32, not 2.6.33.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you want anything bleeding edge, don&#8217;t use Ubuntu.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RSG		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RSG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But 10.04 will have 2.6.32, not 2.6.33.  I&#039;ve been running the .33 kernel for some time, as release candidates, and have had no problems at all.  It boots very slightly faster than .32, but otherwise I see no real difference.  I installed Ubuntu Lucid alpha 3 today, and it looks ok so far.  I&#039;m really looking forward to getting rid of 9.10, and I regret upgrading to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But 10.04 will have 2.6.32, not 2.6.33.  I&#8217;ve been running the .33 kernel for some time, as release candidates, and have had no problems at all.  It boots very slightly faster than .32, but otherwise I see no real difference.  I installed Ubuntu Lucid alpha 3 today, and it looks ok so far.  I&#8217;m really looking forward to getting rid of 9.10, and I regret upgrading to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blenster		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blenster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I admit I&#039;m very much looking forward to Ubuntu 10.4; there may not be a great deal of changes to the UI but the increased hardware support is going to make my spreading it around easier...  I&#039;ve been converting all my users; starting with &quot;problem users&quot; and now my &quot;normal users&quot;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit I&#8217;m very much looking forward to Ubuntu 10.4; there may not be a great deal of changes to the UI but the increased hardware support is going to make my spreading it around easier&#8230;  I&#8217;ve been converting all my users; starting with &#8220;problem users&#8221; and now my &#8220;normal users&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenn		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Screw nouveau, DRBD is HUGE.  Here&#039;s hoping that makes it into RHEL 5.5 or 5.6.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw nouveau, DRBD is HUGE.  Here&#8217;s hoping that makes it into RHEL 5.5 or 5.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jj		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515345</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/26/the-merge-window-for-2634-is-n/#comment-515345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mmmm new kernel, let&#039;s throw some in the microwave and make some popkernel.  

Update time!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmm new kernel, let&#8217;s throw some in the microwave and make some popkernel.  </p>
<p>Update time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
