<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Saints Unapologetic about Unusual Hurt the QB Strategy: &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about no fines, I&#8217;m gonna hit him&#8221; says big scary guy.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A desperate team, who obviously got out played in every aspect of the game had to resort to deliberately trying to hurt and take Favre out to win one for the fans.  That is not only pathetic but shows &quot;zero&quot; class as an organization.  But in today&#039;s culture in America, whatever it takes to win, you do it, no matter how &quot;classless&quot; it may be!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A desperate team, who obviously got out played in every aspect of the game had to resort to deliberately trying to hurt and take Favre out to win one for the fans.  That is not only pathetic but shows &#8220;zero&#8221; class as an organization.  But in today&#8217;s culture in America, whatever it takes to win, you do it, no matter how &#8220;classless&#8221; it may be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, I was totally wrong.  I just hope the Vikings don&#039;t have to meet the Saints in the playoffs again next year!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was totally wrong.  I just hope the Vikings don&#8217;t have to meet the Saints in the playoffs again next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So Dr. Laden, how does that crow taste?  In case you missed it, you were entirely wrong as many have been telling you.  
Oh, I almost forgot to answer your little jab.  My response:  Your ignorance is only exceeded by your arrogance.  I hope you learn how to accept being wrong.  

Oh hell, I&#039;m just fucking with you.  I hope to see Favre in the Superbowl next year, unlikely though it may be.  Cheers Dr. Laden!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Dr. Laden, how does that crow taste?  In case you missed it, you were entirely wrong as many have been telling you.<br />
Oh, I almost forgot to answer your little jab.  My response:  Your ignorance is only exceeded by your arrogance.  I hope you learn how to accept being wrong.  </p>
<p>Oh hell, I&#8217;m just fucking with you.  I hope to see Favre in the Superbowl next year, unlikely though it may be.  Cheers Dr. Laden!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the saints were planning that one interception for weeks.  

Well, good for them, they won fair and square.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the saints were planning that one interception for weeks.  </p>
<p>Well, good for them, they won fair and square.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: amphiox		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513691</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amphiox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Well, it looks like the Saints have not done what I expected them to do during this game. Or, the Colts stopped them.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In retrospect, the hypothesis probably had little chance of confirmation either way. Too many confounding factors and alternative plausibilities.

Which reminds of the oft-cited hierarchy for hypothetical explanations of anomalies:

1. Chance - it was a statistical aberration, no explanation needed (but there&#039;s no fun in discussion these kinds of explanations, so we choose to ignore it)

2. Natural law - it was an unusual combination of perfectly normal circumstances.

3. Incompetence - ie the Viking&#039;s O-line messed up.

4. Malignity - ie the Saints did something nefarious.

And also recalls the statement that one should never suspect malignance when simple incompetence will suffice.

(Though it looks like at the moment the Saints are going to pull it off)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Well, it looks like the Saints have not done what I expected them to do during this game. Or, the Colts stopped them.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In retrospect, the hypothesis probably had little chance of confirmation either way. Too many confounding factors and alternative plausibilities.</p>
<p>Which reminds of the oft-cited hierarchy for hypothetical explanations of anomalies:</p>
<p>1. Chance &#8211; it was a statistical aberration, no explanation needed (but there&#8217;s no fun in discussion these kinds of explanations, so we choose to ignore it)</p>
<p>2. Natural law &#8211; it was an unusual combination of perfectly normal circumstances.</p>
<p>3. Incompetence &#8211; ie the Viking&#8217;s O-line messed up.</p>
<p>4. Malignity &#8211; ie the Saints did something nefarious.</p>
<p>And also recalls the statement that one should never suspect malignance when simple incompetence will suffice.</p>
<p>(Though it looks like at the moment the Saints are going to pull it off)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513690</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Manning looks a lot like Favre for some reason all of the sudden..  

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manning looks a lot like Favre for some reason all of the sudden..  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: amphiox		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513689</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amphiox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, and you finished with a â??butâ?. I gave reasons that the â??butâ? scenario was unlikely, so I feel my response was appropriate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, but if you look more closely, I finished with a &quot;but, if&quot;. The &quot;if&quot; acknowledges the unlikelihood of the scenario, but I still thought it was worth discussion, particularly on a non-serious thread like this one.

And of course your response was appropriate. How could it not be? In my book, very few responses, short of foaming-at-the-mouth-expletive-laden-word-salad-lunacy, are inappropriate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, and you finished with a â??butâ?. I gave reasons that the â??butâ? scenario was unlikely, so I feel my response was appropriate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, but if you look more closely, I finished with a &#8220;but, if&#8221;. The &#8220;if&#8221; acknowledges the unlikelihood of the scenario, but I still thought it was worth discussion, particularly on a non-serious thread like this one.</p>
<p>And of course your response was appropriate. How could it not be? In my book, very few responses, short of foaming-at-the-mouth-expletive-laden-word-salad-lunacy, are inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, it looks like the Saints have not done what I expected them to do during this game. Or, the Colts stopped them. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like the Saints have not done what I expected them to do during this game. Or, the Colts stopped them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JosÃ©		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JosÃ©]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;There were 19. I saw the game, counted them. Sorry. &lt;/i&gt;

Ah... I see the problem.  You were counting the replays too.  Those don&#039;t count.

&lt;i&gt;Oh, and Jose, that link is to an article that suports what I&#039;ve been saying. Saints DO batter quarterbacks. &lt;/i&gt;

It shows is that it&#039;s not unprecedented .  And everybody batters quarterbacks when they get the chance.  The Vikings battered quarterbacks more than any other team this season.  You probably didn&#039;t notice because you were too busy cheering.  

Right now I&#039;m pretending to watch The Who, and I&#039;m getting set to pretend to watch the second half of the football game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There were 19. I saw the game, counted them. Sorry. </i></p>
<p>Ah&#8230; I see the problem.  You were counting the replays too.  Those don&#8217;t count.</p>
<p><i>Oh, and Jose, that link is to an article that suports what I&#8217;ve been saying. Saints DO batter quarterbacks. </i></p>
<p>It shows is that it&#8217;s not unprecedented .  And everybody batters quarterbacks when they get the chance.  The Vikings battered quarterbacks more than any other team this season.  You probably didn&#8217;t notice because you were too busy cheering.  </p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m pretending to watch The Who, and I&#8217;m getting set to pretend to watch the second half of the football game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/04/saints-unapologetic-about-unus/#comment-513686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and Jose, that link is to an article that suports what I&#039;ve been saying.  Saints DO batter quarterbacks.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Jose, that link is to an article that suports what I&#8217;ve been saying.  Saints DO batter quarterbacks.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
