<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: iPad vs. iStone	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also, &quot;iRock&quot; is a think, trademarked, I think.  I used to own one. It was a mp3 player.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, &#8220;iRock&#8221; is a think, trademarked, I think.  I used to own one. It was a mp3 player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kay		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Rob- I think it is supposed to sound like iPhone, but I may be wrong. 

I saw some comments On youtube on a video where people were like &quot;I&#039;m watchin this is 387 B.C. on my iStone 4s!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob- I think it is supposed to sound like iPhone, but I may be wrong. </p>
<p>I saw some comments On youtube on a video where people were like &#8220;I&#8217;m watchin this is 387 B.C. on my iStone 4s!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513464</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think iRock sounds better than iStone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think iRock sounds better than iStone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jean-Denis Muys		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513463</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean-Denis Muys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MPL: &quot;Also, the iPad might be 90% of what 95% people need in a computer, but that last 10% can be an awfully painful compromise.&quot;

I understand that. I feel the same. But the point is elsewhere. The disruption is that this thing, whatever limited it is (and it is), has the potential to attract many new users. Not you. Not me. The fact you have so many &quot;devices&quot; says it all . And so do I.

It&#039;s the rest of them. Not the rest of us.

&quot;them&quot; are all around me. From my children to my parents. From my colleagues to my friends. So many of them, who don&#039;t care much about computers, turn to me (as the recognized expert around here), and ask &quot;would that iPad be nice for me?&quot;.

Yep I may be wrong. But I recognize a potential.

Time will tell.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPL: &#8220;Also, the iPad might be 90% of what 95% people need in a computer, but that last 10% can be an awfully painful compromise.&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand that. I feel the same. But the point is elsewhere. The disruption is that this thing, whatever limited it is (and it is), has the potential to attract many new users. Not you. Not me. The fact you have so many &#8220;devices&#8221; says it all . And so do I.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the rest of them. Not the rest of us.</p>
<p>&#8220;them&#8221; are all around me. From my children to my parents. From my colleagues to my friends. So many of them, who don&#8217;t care much about computers, turn to me (as the recognized expert around here), and ask &#8220;would that iPad be nice for me?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yep I may be wrong. But I recognize a potential.</p>
<p>Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MPL		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@21

I define my years to be 20 days long, don&#039;t you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21</p>
<p>I define my years to be 20 days long, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Rosetta Stone is NOT 40,000 years old!!!!!!!  Damn it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rosetta Stone is NOT 40,000 years old!!!!!!!  Damn it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Spiv:

How exactly is non-x86 a point against? ARM is just as much an industry standard for portable gear as x86 is for desktop. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiv:</p>
<p>How exactly is non-x86 a point against? ARM is just as much an industry standard for portable gear as x86 is for desktop. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MPL		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Jean-Denis,

While your passion is praiseworthy, I think you&#039;ve actually got the situation reversed.  The iPad is portable, but so is my laptop.  I own an iTouch, and many people own various smart phones, and I can attest that I actually carry mine around all day---and use it happily to send email, read the news, etc. when I&#039;m out and about.

There is no way in hell that I would drag an iPad to the bar.

There is a change in the way we use computers happening, but it&#039;s not a replacement of the desktop-at-home: that&#039;s here to stay for a while yet, for when people need to type up a book, or a place to store their photos and music, or to play higher-end games.

The change is that pocket-sized computers like the blackberry, touch, or the android phones, or other smart phones are injecting casual computer use into casual settings, away from the main computer at the office/home.  Form factor is everything, and anything bigger and heavier than a wallet isn&#039;t going to do it.

Also, the iPad might be 90% of what 95% people need in a computer, but that last 10% can be an awfully painful compromise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jean-Denis,</p>
<p>While your passion is praiseworthy, I think you&#8217;ve actually got the situation reversed.  The iPad is portable, but so is my laptop.  I own an iTouch, and many people own various smart phones, and I can attest that I actually carry mine around all day&#8212;and use it happily to send email, read the news, etc. when I&#8217;m out and about.</p>
<p>There is no way in hell that I would drag an iPad to the bar.</p>
<p>There is a change in the way we use computers happening, but it&#8217;s not a replacement of the desktop-at-home: that&#8217;s here to stay for a while yet, for when people need to type up a book, or a place to store their photos and music, or to play higher-end games.</p>
<p>The change is that pocket-sized computers like the blackberry, touch, or the android phones, or other smart phones are injecting casual computer use into casual settings, away from the main computer at the office/home.  Form factor is everything, and anything bigger and heavier than a wallet isn&#8217;t going to do it.</p>
<p>Also, the iPad might be 90% of what 95% people need in a computer, but that last 10% can be an awfully painful compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you will be able to use USB but it will require a cable with a dock connector. Then again, I&#039;m pretty sure Apple would very much prefer people to do everything over Bluetooth or WiFi. I have to admit to having mixed feelings about that -- it certainly saves on infrastructure and cables, but there are also security concerns. (For example, I run an unsecured AP. I have to -- of the three wifi cards in the house, two are WiFi-B, and we all know WEP is worthless.)

My main concern is that the iPad is a nice little piece of work with a lot of potential, but if Apple is dead insistent on tying it to the iTunes App Store, a lot of that potential (particularly the benefits of an ultralight touchscreen in hobby and industrial projects) will go wasted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you will be able to use USB but it will require a cable with a dock connector. Then again, I&#8217;m pretty sure Apple would very much prefer people to do everything over Bluetooth or WiFi. I have to admit to having mixed feelings about that &#8212; it certainly saves on infrastructure and cables, but there are also security concerns. (For example, I run an unsecured AP. I have to &#8212; of the three wifi cards in the house, two are WiFi-B, and we all know WEP is worthless.)</p>
<p>My main concern is that the iPad is a nice little piece of work with a lot of potential, but if Apple is dead insistent on tying it to the iTunes App Store, a lot of that potential (particularly the benefits of an ultralight touchscreen in hobby and industrial projects) will go wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: yak		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/02/01/ipad-vs-istone/#comment-513457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In very light gray text under &quot;Stone&quot; it says &quot;(40,000 BC)&quot;. It is very small and light and almost looks like compression artifacts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In very light gray text under &#8220;Stone&#8221; it says &#8220;(40,000 BC)&#8221;. It is very small and light and almost looks like compression artifacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
