<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;R&#8221; statistical company gets new and important board members	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marion Delgado		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion Delgado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg:

That&#039;s reassuring about R and OpenSource.

Since I dislike what I see as the overhead of KDE stuff*, I usually use Gnome apps, and I used gnumeric in particular for a couple of years until OpenOffice(Neo on Mac) was fast and upgraded for most OSes. I still typically install gnumeric and Euler on any system I have that will take them.

If I&#039;m at work I use Excel, which work bought for me, and the R plugin, anywhere else I use NeoOffice calc and R4Calc. It&#039;s a little more work up front but both Excel (obviously) and NeoOffice can easily save as xls files, so people that don&#039;t know R can see a spreadsheet or an R Dump spreadsheet. In OpenOffice I typically take the steps I typed in in R and save them as a &quot;script&quot; and load them with R4Calc. 

Longwinded way of saying I like interoperability of R and Excel-like things because I feel they&#039;re more accessible.

*In my experience, I had to load endless libraries and apps to run any single KDE app, and Gnome apps seemed friendlier in that dimension.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg:</p>
<p>That&#8217;s reassuring about R and OpenSource.</p>
<p>Since I dislike what I see as the overhead of KDE stuff*, I usually use Gnome apps, and I used gnumeric in particular for a couple of years until OpenOffice(Neo on Mac) was fast and upgraded for most OSes. I still typically install gnumeric and Euler on any system I have that will take them.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m at work I use Excel, which work bought for me, and the R plugin, anywhere else I use NeoOffice calc and R4Calc. It&#8217;s a little more work up front but both Excel (obviously) and NeoOffice can easily save as xls files, so people that don&#8217;t know R can see a spreadsheet or an R Dump spreadsheet. In OpenOffice I typically take the steps I typed in in R and save them as a &#8220;script&#8221; and load them with R4Calc. </p>
<p>Longwinded way of saying I like interoperability of R and Excel-like things because I feel they&#8217;re more accessible.</p>
<p>*In my experience, I had to load endless libraries and apps to run any single KDE app, and Gnome apps seemed friendlier in that dimension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Marion, have you looked at gnumeric?

Regarding if this is a good or a bad thing, I think it&#039;s generally a good thing and I assume R will stay opensource.  Legally, it can&#039;t not stay opensource]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marion, have you looked at gnumeric?</p>
<p>Regarding if this is a good or a bad thing, I think it&#8217;s generally a good thing and I assume R will stay opensource.  Legally, it can&#8217;t not stay opensource</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marion Delgado		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512648</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion Delgado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I live and die by R, but why is this a good or bad thing? Will R stay free and OpenSource?

btw, the proprietary Excel uses its R plugin way, way better than the OpenOffice does its. I contribute a little money to openoffice sometimes, I wonder if I could put a bug in their ear and/or contribute some coding help to make R4Calc work better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live and die by R, but why is this a good or bad thing? Will R stay free and OpenSource?</p>
<p>btw, the proprietary Excel uses its R plugin way, way better than the OpenOffice does its. I contribute a little money to openoffice sometimes, I wonder if I could put a bug in their ear and/or contribute some coding help to make R4Calc work better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to hear they&#039;re doing well. I remember the pre-R days, there was (still is) this commercial software &#039;S&#039; which ran on UNIX machines. Great tool, but far too expensive for undergrad teaching - but I haven&#039;t yet met a statistician who doesn&#039;t use &#039;S&#039;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to hear they&#8217;re doing well. I remember the pre-R days, there was (still is) this commercial software &#8216;S&#8217; which ran on UNIX machines. Great tool, but far too expensive for undergrad teaching &#8211; but I haven&#8217;t yet met a statistician who doesn&#8217;t use &#8216;S&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/25/r-statistical-company-gets-new/#comment-512646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent - the more supported and easier R becomes to use, the better. I&#039;m all for good statistics packages that are platform-independent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent &#8211; the more supported and easier R becomes to use, the better. I&#8217;m all for good statistics packages that are platform-independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
