Comments on: #scio10 My point by point response to The Science Goddess regarding SciOnline 2010 https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/ Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:28:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 By: The Science Goddess https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512184 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:28:38 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512184 Do you suppose that if the whole bottling thing didn’t work out that Damond might offer himself up for cloning?

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512183 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:04:54 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512183 Damond, thanks, and same here. It was great to meet with you and chat at the conference.

]]> By: Damond Nollan https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512182 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:22:00 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512182 Thank you, Greg. If there is anything I can do to help you further, please do not hesitate to ask.

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512181 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:14:08 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512181 Well, the alcohol would normally be the explanation, but in this case it was the 7 week old infant’s sleep patterns!

Well, OK, the alcohol too.

]]> By: The Science Goddess https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512180 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:04:01 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512180 Maybe the key to Bullet Point #1 is the amount of ethanol imbibed? I admit I didn’t try that angle, concerned that the jet lag-hangover combo would not be an advantage in the morning.

Some scientist I am.

]]> By: Scicurious https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512179 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:59:17 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512179 Re: point 1: at least one of us was being sensible! 🙂

]]> By: jdhuey https://gregladen.com/blog/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512178 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:57:29 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2010/01/18/my-point-by-point-response-to/#comment-512178 All I can say is that I found your responses much more intriguing before I read the initiating post. My mind immediately went to the gutter on almost all of the points but especially on the one where you were staying away from SciCurious. Oh well.

]]>