<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yet another flu falsehood	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 03:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Monado, FCD		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monado, FCD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Swine flu shots are starting either tomorrow or Monday for the most vulnerable groups (not me). I&#039;ll probably have to wait til the first week in November. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swine flu shots are starting either tomorrow or Monday for the most vulnerable groups (not me). I&#8217;ll probably have to wait til the first week in November. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: george.w		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[george.w]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Much as I enjoy the thought of Republicans at home with the flu, they should still get the shot.  They might give it to a vulnerable person who could even die - a fellow Republican, perhaps.  Or a child.  They&#039;re always saying how much they care about the children...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as I enjoy the thought of Republicans at home with the flu, they should still get the shot.  They might give it to a vulnerable person who could even die &#8211; a fellow Republican, perhaps.  Or a child.  They&#8217;re always saying how much they care about the children&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In fact, looking at the data, I think I only partly believe what I say above.  People over some age (which is not accurately revealed by the studies I&#039;ve seen because of the way people are grouped in age sets) are way less likley to get this flu than people below that age, and that age is probably such that the 1970s swine flu could be a factor.  Or, it could just be having a large collection of antibodies.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, looking at the data, I think I only partly believe what I say above.  People over some age (which is not accurately revealed by the studies I&#8217;ve seen because of the way people are grouped in age sets) are way less likley to get this flu than people below that age, and that age is probably such that the 1970s swine flu could be a factor.  Or, it could just be having a large collection of antibodies.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you. Should have thought of the CDC.

I think this must be what the doctor was talking about. Apparently, people over 65 are not as likely to get H1N1 so, they are a lower priority for the first round of vacines.

http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/vaccination/vaccine_seniors.htm

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Should have thought of the CDC.</p>
<p>I think this must be what the doctor was talking about. Apparently, people over 65 are not as likely to get H1N1 so, they are a lower priority for the first round of vacines.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/vaccination/vaccine_seniors.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/vaccination/vaccine_seniors.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joel: From the CDC FAQ:

Do those that have been previously vaccinated against the 1976 swine influenza need to get vaccinated against the 2009 H1N1 influenza?

The 1976 swine flu virus and the 2009 H1N1 virus are different enough that its unlikely a person vaccinated in 1976 will have full protection from the 2009 H1N1. People vaccinated in 1976 should still be given the 2009 H1N1 vaccine. 

Added to that, anyone who GOT the swine flue in 1976 is not automatically protected. Almost certainly not.  

Here is the URL for the FAQ: 

http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel: From the CDC FAQ:</p>
<p>Do those that have been previously vaccinated against the 1976 swine influenza need to get vaccinated against the 2009 H1N1 influenza?</p>
<p>The 1976 swine flu virus and the 2009 H1N1 virus are different enough that its unlikely a person vaccinated in 1976 will have full protection from the 2009 H1N1. People vaccinated in 1976 should still be given the 2009 H1N1 vaccine. </p>
<p>Added to that, anyone who GOT the swine flue in 1976 is not automatically protected. Almost certainly not.  </p>
<p>Here is the URL for the FAQ: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chemicalkitchen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chemicalkitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Joel-
They may have been told that they had to wait for the vaccine.  According to the CDC guidelines, individuals aged 25 and older (unless they are health care workers, etc) are in the lowest priority group for the vaccine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joel-<br />
They may have been told that they had to wait for the vaccine.  According to the CDC guidelines, individuals aged 25 and older (unless they are health care workers, etc) are in the lowest priority group for the vaccine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NewEnglandBob		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewEnglandBob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would gladly pay today for a swine flu vaccine Tuesday.
 - Wimpy from Popeye

I will be the first to get on line but so far there are no local places to line up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would gladly pay today for a swine flu vaccine Tuesday.<br />
 &#8211; Wimpy from Popeye</p>
<p>I will be the first to get on line but so far there are no local places to line up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bones		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe they can hire a minister to come in to pray away the flu and deduct his visit on their taxes this year...

Given the language that is being proposed for health care reform, it JUST might be possible:   

SEC. 3103. PROGRAM DESIGN.

    [...]

    (D) The essential benefits provided for in subparagraph (A) shall include a requirement that there be non-discrimination in health care in a manner that, with respect to an individual who is eligible for medical or surgical care under a qualified health plan offered through a Gateway, prohibits the Administrator of the Gateway, or a qualified health plan offered through the Gateway, from denying such individual benefits for religious or spiritual health care, except that such religious or spiritual health care shall be an expense eligible for deduction as a medical care expense as determined by Internal Revenue Service Rulings interpreting section 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as of January 1, 2009.

from: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=2196]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they can hire a minister to come in to pray away the flu and deduct his visit on their taxes this year&#8230;</p>
<p>Given the language that is being proposed for health care reform, it JUST might be possible:   </p>
<p>SEC. 3103. PROGRAM DESIGN.</p>
<p>    [&#8230;]</p>
<p>    (D) The essential benefits provided for in subparagraph (A) shall include a requirement that there be non-discrimination in health care in a manner that, with respect to an individual who is eligible for medical or surgical care under a qualified health plan offered through a Gateway, prohibits the Administrator of the Gateway, or a qualified health plan offered through the Gateway, from denying such individual benefits for religious or spiritual health care, except that such religious or spiritual health care shall be an expense eligible for deduction as a medical care expense as determined by Internal Revenue Service Rulings interpreting section 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as of January 1, 2009.</p>
<p>from: <a href="http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=2196" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=2196</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/yet-another-flu-falsehood/#comment-548893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was talking to a friend of mine the other day and she told me that her parents doctor told them they could not have the H1N1 vacine due to their age, something about being exposed to a similar flu in the &#039;60&#039;s or &#039;70&#039;s. It didn&#039;t sound right to me...

Do you have any additional information or links that I could send to this friend about this? I would like to forward the information to my friend. Her parents now think the government, Obama, wants them to die off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to a friend of mine the other day and she told me that her parents doctor told them they could not have the H1N1 vacine due to their age, something about being exposed to a similar flu in the &#8217;60&#8217;s or &#8217;70&#8217;s. It didn&#8217;t sound right to me&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you have any additional information or links that I could send to this friend about this? I would like to forward the information to my friend. Her parents now think the government, Obama, wants them to die off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
