<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fox News Attacks Rachel Maddow.  Maddow Folds.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joshua Zelinsky		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Zelinsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maddow is funny here but I think that there is an annoying element to this. It seems like she they are implying that because Bush engaged in worse behavior it somehow makes it ok. The relevant defense is much simpler and needs more emphasis: Of course the President is free to chose which news sources he meets with and which he doesn&#039;t. Everyone does. The fact that the Bush admin was more extreme isn&#039;t relevant to that argument. (Although I&#039;d be inclined to argue that there were certain things the Bush administration did that were actively bad such as trying to make fake reporters but even then that doesn&#039;t make Obama good just because Bush did really bad stuff). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maddow is funny here but I think that there is an annoying element to this. It seems like she they are implying that because Bush engaged in worse behavior it somehow makes it ok. The relevant defense is much simpler and needs more emphasis: Of course the President is free to chose which news sources he meets with and which he doesn&#8217;t. Everyone does. The fact that the Bush admin was more extreme isn&#8217;t relevant to that argument. (Although I&#8217;d be inclined to argue that there were certain things the Bush administration did that were actively bad such as trying to make fake reporters but even then that doesn&#8217;t make Obama good just because Bush did really bad stuff). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Coleman		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a shock, you&#039;re a fan of spanking (providing it&#039;s Maddow doling it out)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shock, you&#8217;re a fan of spanking (providing it&#8217;s Maddow doling it out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: itzac		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itzac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: accusations of a double standard from a Fox reporter.

There isn&#039;t a double standard, just a standard. Fox doesn&#039;t meet it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: accusations of a double standard from a Fox reporter.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a double standard, just a standard. Fox doesn&#8217;t meet it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: aratina cage		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aratina cage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I laughed hard when she said, &quot;Joining us now is - Keith Olbermann.&quot; A one-two punch. 

*sigh* The last decade was Hell on Earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laughed hard when she said, &#8220;Joining us now is &#8211; Keith Olbermann.&#8221; A one-two punch. </p>
<p>*sigh* The last decade was Hell on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Man Version		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Man Version]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is why I have a huge crush on Rachel. Thanks for posting this, Greg. Still chuckling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I have a huge crush on Rachel. Thanks for posting this, Greg. Still chuckling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: megan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[megan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This all ties back to the growing anti-science, vaccine, anti-global warming meme being pushed by those whose philosophy or belief is so weak in the arena of moral relativism it&#039;s glaringly FAIL as all levels. So therefore attack anything that is proven by facts and rigorous scientific method and critiques. Sophists in the modern definition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all ties back to the growing anti-science, vaccine, anti-global warming meme being pushed by those whose philosophy or belief is so weak in the arena of moral relativism it&#8217;s glaringly FAIL as all levels. So therefore attack anything that is proven by facts and rigorous scientific method and critiques. Sophists in the modern definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eli		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Post-traumatic political stress disorder would imply that they were actually honest BEFORE they left office.

Modern movement conservatism has no use for the truth.  They don&#039;t even have a fancy word for it like the left does &quot;moral relativism&quot; (did anyone ever really believe in that anyway?)  They simply throw any batshit crazy smear they can at the wall and hope it sticks.  

Fortunately, at least for now it appears that the public is largely seeing through the Republican party and its fealty to these sleazeballs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post-traumatic political stress disorder would imply that they were actually honest BEFORE they left office.</p>
<p>Modern movement conservatism has no use for the truth.  They don&#8217;t even have a fancy word for it like the left does &#8220;moral relativism&#8221; (did anyone ever really believe in that anyway?)  They simply throw any batshit crazy smear they can at the wall and hope it sticks.  </p>
<p>Fortunately, at least for now it appears that the public is largely seeing through the Republican party and its fealty to these sleazeballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Chemist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549195</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Chemist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/10/22/fox-news-attacks-rachel-maddow/#comment-549195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At first I was like NOOO!
But then I was like Hells yeah.

What you did there, I see it.

(Any more memes I can cram in here?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I was like NOOO!<br />
But then I was like Hells yeah.</p>
<p>What you did there, I see it.</p>
<p>(Any more memes I can cram in here?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
