Science Is Inside A Reality (Inside The Controlled Enviroment)

Science Is Measuring Reality Using Tools From That Reality (Part Of The Controlled Enviroment)

Science Can Only Measure Something Accuratly If It Is Outside The Controlled Enviroment!

If The Lord Manifested A Rock At This Moment! Then Science Would Measure It And Say Its A Billion Years Old! It However Did Not Exist Until The Lord Manifested It At This Moment!

The Lord Controls Our Reality, Time And Space, He Has The Remote Control! To The Lord A Billion Eternities Could Be a Day!

He Is The Dreamer, We are The Dreamed!

Science Has A Major Role As It Teaches Us About The Reality And The Rules That We Are Governed By The Reality We Are Subject To And A Part Of!

There IS NO Argument Both States Exist Both Are Correct

Science Simply Cannot Measure That Which Created The Controlled Enviromen Because Science Is Inside The Controlled Enviroment!

Most people, especially in the West, view life in linear time with a beginning and an end. To some in the East, life is cyclical and continuous; time repeats itself endlessly in an altered form. For them the Universe itself is infinite and eternal, a continuum of expansion and contraction.

The Oxford American Dictionary defines “brane” as: an extended object with any given number of dimensions, of which strings in string theory are examples with one dimension. Our universe is a 3-brane.

“Endless Universe / Beyond the Big Bang” (published by Doubleday 2007) was written by Paul Steinhardt, Albert Einstein professor of physics at Princeton, and Neil Turok, Chair of Mathematical Physics at Cambridge. They write:
“The big bang was not the beginning but the moment separating our current period of expansion and cooling from a previous one. …the universe has an extra dimension [beyond space-time] bounded by branes…the branes collided with each other to create the bang.”

In “The Fabric of the Cosmos (published by Vintage Books 2005), Columbia University professor of physics and mathematics Brian Greene says:
“…if cosmological evolution on our three-brane [universe] is driven by repeated collisions with a nearby brane, time as we know it would span only one of the universe’s many cycles, with one big bang followed by another, and then another.”

“The Language of God,” by Francis S. Collins (Free Press/Simon & Schuster 2006). Dr Collins was head-Human Genome Project. He believes that faith in God and science can co-exist and be harmonious.

“Let There be Light,” by Howard Smith (New World Library 2006). Dr. Smith is a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center. He explains how modern study of the cosmos complements the Kabbalah.

“Intelligence in Nature,” by Jeremy Narby (Jeremy P. Thatcher/Penguin 2005). Dr. Narby has a doctorate in anthropology. He makes a reasoned connection between shamanistic beliefs and modern science.

If someone is so deluded so as to not see it by this point, no amount of proof will do it. For some, no fossil will ever be “transitional” enough, no ocellus will ever be rudimentary enough, and no molecular apparatus will ever be sufficiently “reduced” into simpler functional forms to satisfy their demand for “evidence”– because they don’t understand what the words evidence and proof mean in the first place.

—
http://noamgr.wordpress.com

On the actual paper… well, not my specialty, but it seems rather “meh”. Looks like a fairly standard molecular analysis sexed up. Oh, and I’m a bit miffed since they didn’t cite the original “irreducible complexity” smackdown The Evolutionary Origin of Complex Features published in Nature back in 2003.