<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Blog Rules	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: luna1580		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luna1580]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thank you SC. 

i still feel isis never really countered anything i said in that thread, other than her attempt to default to DM&#039;s related post without adding her own thoughts on it. i still do not understand why she is a &lt;i&gt;science&lt;/i&gt;blogger.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you SC. </p>
<p>i still feel isis never really countered anything i said in that thread, other than her attempt to default to DM&#8217;s related post without adding her own thoughts on it. i still do not understand why she is a <i>science</i>blogger&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D. C. Sessions		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. Sessions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jason @152:

I notice that there is little objection when people (Greg, Stephanie, you, and me -- to name four) call out Republicans for tacitly endorsing the birfers, Glenn Beck at his worst, etc.  This despite the fact that as far as I know none of us are Republicans and thus have no standing to comment on the &quot;in-group&quot; aspects of right-wing dogma.

&lt;blockquote&gt;If a person speaks in that role, for instance Dawkins speaking as an advocate for atheism, and they say something ridiculous and indefensible, like that the holocaust never happened, then not only do the other atheists who are members of that group have the right to be embarrassed, but they also get to call Dawkins out on being such an embarrassment&lt;/blockquote&gt;

... but are often reluctant to do so, in fear of &quot;breaking solidarity&quot; or &quot;undermining our position.&quot;  Needless to say, this dynamic can be (and historically has been) abused.

Come to think of it, it would appear that it&#039;s being abused right now -- thus we have Limbaugh as the &lt;i&gt;de facto&lt;/i&gt; head of the Republican Party.  I wonder if we should damn the Republicans with the faint praise of, &quot;At least they aren&#039;t whining that non-Republicans shouldn&#039;t comment.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason @152:</p>
<p>I notice that there is little objection when people (Greg, Stephanie, you, and me &#8212; to name four) call out Republicans for tacitly endorsing the birfers, Glenn Beck at his worst, etc.  This despite the fact that as far as I know none of us are Republicans and thus have no standing to comment on the &#8220;in-group&#8221; aspects of right-wing dogma.</p>
<blockquote><p>If a person speaks in that role, for instance Dawkins speaking as an advocate for atheism, and they say something ridiculous and indefensible, like that the holocaust never happened, then not only do the other atheists who are members of that group have the right to be embarrassed, but they also get to call Dawkins out on being such an embarrassment</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; but are often reluctant to do so, in fear of &#8220;breaking solidarity&#8221; or &#8220;undermining our position.&#8221;  Needless to say, this dynamic can be (and historically has been) abused.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, it would appear that it&#8217;s being abused right now &#8212; thus we have Limbaugh as the <i>de facto</i> head of the Republican Party.  I wonder if we should damn the Republicans with the faint praise of, &#8220;At least they aren&#8217;t whining that non-Republicans shouldn&#8217;t comment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas Krawford		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Krawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s cool.

I Thomas Krawford am an African American male underemployed Peripatetic Cab Driver living in Ann Arbor with two graduate degrees, a pending Teaching Certificate, a recently diagnosed semi-mild Autistic disorder and a yet to be written story about waking up middle aged after 34 years of never really fitting in anywhere but laughing a lot anyway.

The story is a little James Joyce Ulysses and a lot Giovanni Batista Vico. I think there are a lot of funny parts, but we&#039;ll see.

Always thinking  (^_&#039; 

Tom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool.</p>
<p>I Thomas Krawford am an African American male underemployed Peripatetic Cab Driver living in Ann Arbor with two graduate degrees, a pending Teaching Certificate, a recently diagnosed semi-mild Autistic disorder and a yet to be written story about waking up middle aged after 34 years of never really fitting in anywhere but laughing a lot anyway.</p>
<p>The story is a little James Joyce Ulysses and a lot Giovanni Batista Vico. I think there are a lot of funny parts, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Always thinking  (^_&#8217; </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Thibeault		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Thibeault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and Lord Flashheart is hilarious.  I still haven&#039;t seen nearly enough Blackadder.  I will make a point of doing so as soon as possible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Lord Flashheart is hilarious.  I still haven&#8217;t seen nearly enough Blackadder.  I will make a point of doing so as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Thibeault		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Thibeault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Becca: Rightly or wrongly, I sort of see people who advocate for a particular group, as being emissaries for that group.  I suspect most people do as well.  If a person speaks in that role, for instance Dawkins speaking as an advocate for atheism, and they say something ridiculous and indefensible, like that the holocaust never happened, then not only do the other atheists who are members of that group have the right to be embarrassed, but they also get to call Dawkins out on being such an embarrassment (in politics, often referred to as &quot;throwing X under the bus&quot;).  You know the &quot;other side&quot; is going to point out the foibles of that emissary and do what they can to ensure the fallout damages the entire cause.

So, yes, bringing the group into it isn&#039;t fair, but when you&#039;re acting in defense of feminism and what you&#039;re doing is ultimately indefensible (equivalent to &quot;crying wolf&quot;), then you&#039;re providing ammunition to the proper misogynists who will later claim that feminists eat their own or can&#039;t even recognize when they&#039;re unintentionally (or intentionally) diminishing other out-groups like &quot;brown people&quot; or atheists.

Do I like this dynamic?  Not at all.  Do I think you make lizards seem pretty awesome by being their queen without even having been elected by people like CyberLizard?  Oooh, a chicken.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becca: Rightly or wrongly, I sort of see people who advocate for a particular group, as being emissaries for that group.  I suspect most people do as well.  If a person speaks in that role, for instance Dawkins speaking as an advocate for atheism, and they say something ridiculous and indefensible, like that the holocaust never happened, then not only do the other atheists who are members of that group have the right to be embarrassed, but they also get to call Dawkins out on being such an embarrassment (in politics, often referred to as &#8220;throwing X under the bus&#8221;).  You know the &#8220;other side&#8221; is going to point out the foibles of that emissary and do what they can to ensure the fallout damages the entire cause.</p>
<p>So, yes, bringing the group into it isn&#8217;t fair, but when you&#8217;re acting in defense of feminism and what you&#8217;re doing is ultimately indefensible (equivalent to &#8220;crying wolf&#8221;), then you&#8217;re providing ammunition to the proper misogynists who will later claim that feminists eat their own or can&#8217;t even recognize when they&#8217;re unintentionally (or intentionally) diminishing other out-groups like &#8220;brown people&#8221; or atheists.</p>
<p>Do I like this dynamic?  Not at all.  Do I think you make lizards seem pretty awesome by being their queen without even having been elected by people like CyberLizard?  Oooh, a chicken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnV		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What in the world did I just watch for 5 minutes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the world did I just watch for 5 minutes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SC		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9FcNuR-TOs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9FcNuR-TOs" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9FcNuR-TOs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Z		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mine&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;wee&lt;/i&gt; bit more emphatic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine&#8217;s a <i>wee</i> bit more emphatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two places, but mostly this is a teacher I know imitating high school boys explaining stuff (like, why are you doing what you are not supposed to be doing) to said teacher.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two places, but mostly this is a teacher I know imitating high school boys explaining stuff (like, why are you doing what you are not supposed to be doing) to said teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephanie Z		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/23/new-blog-rules/#comment-546353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Which is, I&#039;m sure, very different from the place it touches in my warped little psyche. Care to share?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is, I&#8217;m sure, very different from the place it touches in my warped little psyche. Care to share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
