Comments on: Muammar al-Gaddafi: Not a bad speech

By: sajid

sajid — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:47:35 +0000

UN removed the English transcript from its website and western media removed the transcript from all types of media resources. MetaExistence Organization made an effort to restore the original transcript from his video speech.

Complete Speech Transcript (English Version)

http://www.metaexistence.org/gaddafispeech.htm

MetaExistence Organization
Think Tank of Islamic World
http://metaexistence.org

By: Aliia

Aliia — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:44:07 +0000

I think the only raving lunatic is the American people and their president.

By: JosÃ©

JosÃ© — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:45:07 +0000

@johannes
I think Louis Farrakhan is a nutty racist. That doesn’t mean it’s OK for me to refer to him in a racist manner.

By: johannes

johannes — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:32:59 +0000

> Oh..and whats all these racist comments about his dress?

> The man is African and proud of his heritage..if you have a
> problem with that then get some therapy.

Gaddafi a victim of racism? My ironometer has just exploded.
Gaddafi is allowed to stay in power because he keeps African refugees out of the EU, often by methods that make Gitmo look like a holiday camp in comparision.

By: JohnV

JohnV — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:45:43 +0000

ahhh an early morning smile brought to my face by bat shit craziness.

By: BARAWANI KING

BARAWANI KING — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:47:22 +0000

Col. Gadaffi is an african, arabian PATRIOTIC. can you see any other leader can comment or can say what GADDAFI said yesterday in the UN Podium, because ARAB leaders are racist, colonolialists and puppets to USA, UK and French Imperialists.

We do africans wants 7.7 trillion of US DOLLARS as compensation, some as ITALIANS compensated to LIBYANS. Today, it is the time that UK AND USA must compensate for the bad deeds they made to AFRICANS, or face a holy war.

By: wondy

wondy — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:00:05 +0000

i think that you guys all are raving lunatic. how much you’d like to critisize gaddafi doesn’t show that he is a lunatic freak. it just shows that the people who had left these comments are brainless gits. i don’t give a shit what you guys say but i personally agree with the statement about the UN council been as a “terrorism council’. serously tell me in the last 60-70 years of the UN history what have they achieved other than encouraging wars ha? honetly, some political leaders are dreary!

By: Greg Laden

Greg Laden — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:38:02 +0000

Jeremy, I don’t think he demanded an investigation into the assassination of JFK. I think he was demanding an investigation into the assassination of Patrice Lamumba by JFK. I might have heard that wrong, but if that was the case it certainly is not an insane question.

But yes, he is a nutbag, that’s hard to deny. But being a nutbag does not mean he can’t make valid points or that his valid points would be coincidence.

By: kelly

kelly — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:21:11 +0000

To me it seems that people want to view him as a lunatic but that is just people being closed minded and judgmental. I do not side with any religion but I grew up Catholic. In the 15 mins I saw today on Al jazeer it made me curious about him. He made valid points on things that a lot of people try to forget about and just believe the half concocted stories they are told. I hope to hear all of what he had to say. It is always interesting to hear someone elses point of view even if you do not agree with all of it. People do need to wake up and hear what others have to say and not judge just by look color and religion.

By: dean

dean — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:26:28 +0000

“Still channeling Henry Louis Gates, Dean? ”
No, I don’t channel anyone. Not sure what your point is, either.
You are apparently unaware of Mike’s history of comments against people he deems inferior. (You could be ignoring it, I’m not sure.)

And, before you make this accusation: I’m not defending Gadaffi, either – and you won’t find anywhere that I have.