<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: School officials face possible jail terms for praying against court orders	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Badger3k		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badger3k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heck, maybe they can get a transfer so that they can work with Brother Hovind.  Then they can all prey..er, pray...together.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, maybe they can get a transfer so that they can work with Brother Hovind.  Then they can all prey..er, pray&#8230;together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sevesteen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevesteen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party protests are based on agreement between conservatives and libertarians on a particular issue.  Lots of libertarians, but certainly not exclusive, and I doubt majority.  

We split with the conservatives on most of their desire to get government to enforce their &quot;family values&quot; or to enforce American values on other countries.  

In fact, if you want to enforce something on individuals, we are probably on the other side. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party protests are based on agreement between conservatives and libertarians on a particular issue.  Lots of libertarians, but certainly not exclusive, and I doubt majority.  </p>
<p>We split with the conservatives on most of their desire to get government to enforce their &#8220;family values&#8221; or to enforce American values on other countries.  </p>
<p>In fact, if you want to enforce something on individuals, we are probably on the other side. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t the teabaggers call &#039;emselves Libertarians?

The guys who are in trouble with the law should welcome a jail term; it will give them a chance to save themselves by preaching in jail. Since they are not part of the penal system, they won&#039;t be running foul of the constitution while preaching to the prison population. Of course being invited to preach by any prison official would mean that someone&#039;s breaking the law again.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t the teabaggers call &#8217;emselves Libertarians?</p>
<p>The guys who are in trouble with the law should welcome a jail term; it will give them a chance to save themselves by preaching in jail. Since they are not part of the penal system, they won&#8217;t be running foul of the constitution while preaching to the prison population. Of course being invited to preach by any prison official would mean that someone&#8217;s breaking the law again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545570</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you find the thread you are reading interesting, you will also find &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/poll_should_educators_be_fined.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THIS&lt;/a&gt; very interesting.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you find the thread you are reading interesting, you will also find <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/poll_should_educators_be_fined.php" rel="nofollow">THIS</a> very interesting.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rev Matt		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rev Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The label &quot;Libertarian&quot; is at least in the U.S. not specific enough.  It is used to identify a broad swath of people who are basically &#039;anti-government&#039; and people self identify as libertarian who are all over the political spectrum.  

There&#039;s the classic liberatarian and want absolute minimal government interference in everything (which Chas appears to be.  

There&#039;s the states-rights libertarian who is in favor of small federal government but doesn&#039;t seem to mind invasive government as long as it&#039;s the local government doing it (most often them operate with the view that they will have significant influence over what local government does and so it&#039;s invasions will be to their favor).  

There&#039;s the liberal libertarians who favor maximum civil rights for individuals but fairly strict regulation of business and focusing federal revenues on social programs.  

There&#039;s the big business libertarians who favor no regulation of business at all but want a strong police state to ensure a safe operating environment for their business.  

And then there&#039;s the most vocal* subset of libertarians who believe in small government except when they want the government to force everyone to hew to their personal beliefs, most often some form of Dominionist Christianity.

I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve left out at least a half dozen or more, including the &#039;single issue/narrow spectrum&#039; libertarians who are largely apolitical except in the are of their specific interest(read: legalizing pot).

*not the largest group, just the loudest]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The label &#8220;Libertarian&#8221; is at least in the U.S. not specific enough.  It is used to identify a broad swath of people who are basically &#8216;anti-government&#8217; and people self identify as libertarian who are all over the political spectrum.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s the classic liberatarian and want absolute minimal government interference in everything (which Chas appears to be.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s the states-rights libertarian who is in favor of small federal government but doesn&#8217;t seem to mind invasive government as long as it&#8217;s the local government doing it (most often them operate with the view that they will have significant influence over what local government does and so it&#8217;s invasions will be to their favor).  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s the liberal libertarians who favor maximum civil rights for individuals but fairly strict regulation of business and focusing federal revenues on social programs.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s the big business libertarians who favor no regulation of business at all but want a strong police state to ensure a safe operating environment for their business.  </p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the most vocal* subset of libertarians who believe in small government except when they want the government to force everyone to hew to their personal beliefs, most often some form of Dominionist Christianity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve left out at least a half dozen or more, including the &#8216;single issue/narrow spectrum&#8217; libertarians who are largely apolitical except in the are of their specific interest(read: legalizing pot).</p>
<p>*not the largest group, just the loudest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin K		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Libertarians would extend civil rights to all sorts of people. This discussion mirrors my arguments with right wingers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re using the traditional definition of &quot;libertarian&quot;. Unfortunately, the term has been appropriated by the right wing. Most people who call themselves &quot;libertarian&quot; now are either moderate Republicans who are embarrassed to admit to it, or are hard cases who think the Republicans have gone soft. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Libertarians would extend civil rights to all sorts of people. This discussion mirrors my arguments with right wingers.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re using the traditional definition of &#8220;libertarian&#8221;. Unfortunately, the term has been appropriated by the right wing. Most people who call themselves &#8220;libertarian&#8221; now are either moderate Republicans who are embarrassed to admit to it, or are hard cases who think the Republicans have gone soft. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chas		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ha!  Libertarians would extend civil rights to all sorts of people.  This discussion mirrors my arguments with right wingers.  When I tell them that drug abusers shouldn&#039;t be jailed for harming themselves they assume that I am a drug abuser and only want this because of my own fears of being imprisoned.  Libertarians attempt to be principled and rational in their thoughts of governance.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Libertarians would extend civil rights to all sorts of people.  This discussion mirrors my arguments with right wingers.  When I tell them that drug abusers shouldn&#8217;t be jailed for harming themselves they assume that I am a drug abuser and only want this because of my own fears of being imprisoned.  Libertarians attempt to be principled and rational in their thoughts of governance.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sam:  Thanks, I couldn&#039;t find the words on this early Friday morning, but you did!


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam:  Thanks, I couldn&#8217;t find the words on this early Friday morning, but you did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam C		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sevesteen #12:&lt;blockquote&gt;The libertarian philosophy I am familiar with is pretty much &quot;Don&#039;t boss me, don&#039;t touch my stuff, I&#039;ll do the same for you&quot;. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think the more common attitude of libertarians is &quot;Don&#039;t boss me, don&#039;t touch my stuff, leave me be to do whatever I want and I&#039;ll let you do whatever &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; want too.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sevesteen #12:</p>
<blockquote><p>The libertarian philosophy I am familiar with is pretty much &#8220;Don&#8217;t boss me, don&#8217;t touch my stuff, I&#8217;ll do the same for you&#8221;. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think the more common attitude of libertarians is &#8220;Don&#8217;t boss me, don&#8217;t touch my stuff, leave me be to do whatever I want and I&#8217;ll let you do whatever <i><b>I</b></i> want too.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sevesteen		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevesteen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/17/school-officials-face-possible/#comment-545564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The libertarian philosophy I am familiar with is pretty much &quot;Don&#039;t  boss me, don&#039;t touch my stuff, I&#039;ll do the same for you&quot;.  I can&#039;t see any reasonable way that this could be considered requiring others to share philosophy, especially compared to liberal &quot;We require everyone to chip in and help the less fortunate&quot;.  Or the conservative &quot;our Christian values should be law, it&#039;s one nation under God&quot; for that matter.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The libertarian philosophy I am familiar with is pretty much &#8220;Don&#8217;t  boss me, don&#8217;t touch my stuff, I&#8217;ll do the same for you&#8221;.  I can&#8217;t see any reasonable way that this could be considered requiring others to share philosophy, especially compared to liberal &#8220;We require everyone to chip in and help the less fortunate&#8221;.  Or the conservative &#8220;our Christian values should be law, it&#8217;s one nation under God&#8221; for that matter.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
