<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which Browser is Better?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan J		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&#8230;it would involve buying a copy of Windows&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh; wait a second. No, I&#039;m not running any virtual machines. That was just a virtual thought experiment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&hellip;it would involve buying a copy of Windows</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh; wait a second. No, I&#8217;m not running any virtual machines. That was just a virtual thought experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Google Chrome will update automatically with security updates. Crossover chromium, as with anything that is &quot;crossover,&quot; is &quot;wine&quot; but with some help to make it atually work.  I&#039;ve had good luck with earlier versions of crossover chromium and with crossover in general.  The current version is still &quot;proof of concept&quot; but then gain sometimes I think Firefox is too, and IE is always &quot;proof of the concept that you are a moron for using this sucky software&quot;

I have not played with virtual machines on my linux box, partly because it would involve buying a copy of Windows.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome will update automatically with security updates. Crossover chromium, as with anything that is &#8220;crossover,&#8221; is &#8220;wine&#8221; but with some help to make it atually work.  I&#8217;ve had good luck with earlier versions of crossover chromium and with crossover in general.  The current version is still &#8220;proof of concept&#8221; but then gain sometimes I think Firefox is too, and IE is always &#8220;proof of the concept that you are a moron for using this sucky software&#8221;</p>
<p>I have not played with virtual machines on my linux box, partly because it would involve buying a copy of Windows.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan J		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using a special version of Firefox 3.5 (Shiretoko) on Ubuntu 9.04 while the standard version is continuing development.

&lt;blockquote&gt;It turns out that  Firefox runs faster in Wine than natively.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfortunately, I think this is the case for several programs whose developers continue to focus on the Windows platform almost exclusively.

I think &quot;Crossover Chromium&quot; might be a similarly good idea for those who want to try out Google&#039;s Chromium browser in Linux.

I&#039;ve found that Google Earth operates much more smoothly within a virtual machine than it does natively in Linux. I understand it also works using wine, so I may have to give that a try too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using a special version of Firefox 3.5 (Shiretoko) on Ubuntu 9.04 while the standard version is continuing development.</p>
<blockquote><p>It turns out that  Firefox runs faster in Wine than natively.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, I think this is the case for several programs whose developers continue to focus on the Windows platform almost exclusively.</p>
<p>I think &#8220;Crossover Chromium&#8221; might be a similarly good idea for those who want to try out Google&#8217;s Chromium browser in Linux.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that Google Earth operates much more smoothly within a virtual machine than it does natively in Linux. I understand it also works using wine, so I may have to give that a try too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hukrepus		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544401</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hukrepus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When loading sessions with &gt;50 tabs Opera (9.64) is much faster than Firefox (3).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When loading sessions with >50 tabs Opera (9.64) is much faster than Firefox (3).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What I should REALLY  do is to compile all my software that would be fun.

I wonder, though, if swiftweasel would close the gab these stats indicate.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I should REALLY  do is to compile all my software that would be fun.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, if swiftweasel would close the gab these stats indicate.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: C. Chu		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Chu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg, you might be interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://swiftweasel.tuxfamily.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Swiftweasel&lt;/a&gt; since you&#039;re running Ubuntu. It turns out that &lt;a href=&quot;http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/18058/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Firefox runs faster in Wine than natively&lt;/a&gt;. The Windows builds are profile-guide optimized for your processor, but the Linux builds in Ubuntu aren&#039;t by default. 

The Swiftweasel Project is simply a guy who runs the 2-hour PGO Firefox compile for various instruction set architectures and rebrands it as Swiftweasel. Indistinguishable from Firefox, minus the fact that it&#039;s optimized for your particular CPU. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, you might be interested in <a href="http://swiftweasel.tuxfamily.org/" rel="nofollow"> Swiftweasel</a> since you&#8217;re running Ubuntu. It turns out that <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/18058/" rel="nofollow"> Firefox runs faster in Wine than natively</a>. The Windows builds are profile-guide optimized for your processor, but the Linux builds in Ubuntu aren&#8217;t by default. </p>
<p>The Swiftweasel Project is simply a guy who runs the 2-hour PGO Firefox compile for various instruction set architectures and rebrands it as Swiftweasel. Indistinguishable from Firefox, minus the fact that it&#8217;s optimized for your particular CPU. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I do actually have installed, but I&#039;m not quite into the paradigm yet. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I do actually have installed, but I&#8217;m not quite into the paradigm yet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nathan Myers		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/09/07/which-browser-is-better/#comment-544397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you go to the Chrome site and click &quot;download&quot;, you get a .deb file.  &quot;dpkg -i&quot; it, and you&#039;re in. 

Chrome is still Alpha.  It&#039;s a Good Thing that apt-get doesn&#039;t find it, because it still lacks lots of features you probably think are essential, and they&#039;re mainly interested in finding out what makes it crash.  As my brother-in-law at Google points out, &quot;It&#039;s not about you.&quot;

To me what is worst is that it insists on using ugly default or page-specified fonts instead of the beautiful &quot;Linux Libertine&quot; that Firefox is willing to use if I tell it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to the Chrome site and click &#8220;download&#8221;, you get a .deb file.  &#8220;dpkg -i&#8221; it, and you&#8217;re in. </p>
<p>Chrome is still Alpha.  It&#8217;s a Good Thing that apt-get doesn&#8217;t find it, because it still lacks lots of features you probably think are essential, and they&#8217;re mainly interested in finding out what makes it crash.  As my brother-in-law at Google points out, &#8220;It&#8217;s not about you.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me what is worst is that it insists on using ugly default or page-specified fonts instead of the beautiful &#8220;Linux Libertine&#8221; that Firefox is willing to use if I tell it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
