Sorry, no one is aware of these silly comments at the end of this thread because very few people read your blog. For all your wittering, you need blogs like Greg’s to gain an audience.

Also, despite your apparently random ramblings, it is only you I am insulting – nobody else but you.

I will now take up no more of Greg’s time by adding to this thread, as I’m sure he has better things to do than listen to us bicker.

FtBS

“Are you talking to Fred the Bulbous Squidge or to John A. Davison?”

Neither, Greg was talking to you, Fluppy.

That’s Greg, not Glen, but Greg.

Got that? Get someone to write that down for you!

“No matter what you do, I win, you lose.”

Only in your own deranged mind.

Fluppy, once again you betray the fact that you have no idea how blogs work. We are now commenting on a post from September 2009. Nobody is reading this (which, incidentally, is why I’m a little less worried about feeding the troll than I would be otherwise).

Fluppy, you complain about being insulted and being banished. These things happen to you because of the way you act on forums such as these. You come across as completely barking mad. That isn’t an insult, it’s the truth (note lack of upper case “T”). There is no witch-hunt, there is no conspiracy. It’s all in your head.

FtBS

PS Greg, if you don’t want to add this to the thread I will fully understand, and apologise for wasting your time in the process.

But he does appreciate all the opportunities to alter your web addresses so the point to Talk Origins and NCSE and such like.

“You also are…supremely confident that I am a fool.”

You have provided us with enough evidence, to be fair.

I am not in love with you

Oh, yes you are. That is why you can’t stop commenting here. You keep saying good bye, that this or that is your last comment, but you can’t bring yourself to stop. The only way for you to stop is if I stop you, because you can’t do it yourself.

I was wondering why you are so angry. Now, I realize why. You angry with yourself, probably for many things, but at the moment, for being obsessed with me and this blog.

True or not, the reasoning goes along darwinian pathways. I would be surpised if someone from multiregionalists challenged the schema of natural selection. The only naturalistic explanations are allowed, however far-fetched they might be.

Obviously monoregionalists and multiregionalists pursue their “science” wihout greater impact on public. I read that 70% US population believes that homo sapiens was created in last 10.000 years.

“Evolutinary biologists” are pretty nervous from such statistics. They do not realize that their explanation is the most bizzare fantasy – human has arisen from an ancient fish by random mutation!

Keep it coming! I know you’re obsessed with me and can’t walk away. The only way you are EVER going to stop commenting on my blog is if I stop you. You can’t stop yourself. You are in love with me. You are addicted to me.

Someday you’ll figure out what I’ve done to you and you’ll get a lawyer and sue me.

1) How is your hypothesis different than the multiregional hypothesis as articulated by various prior researchers; and

2) Can you provide a few examples of other mammal species where this has occurred?

Never heard about “multiregional hypothesis” but I would bet this the concept rests firmly on “natural selection” mantra.

Professor Davison claims in his Manifesto that as soon as sexual reproduction in a given species is established the evolution is over. He listed quite intersting information regarding non-homology of germ cells in species which are believed to have “common ancestor”.

As professor Davison mentioned, the whole idea of “natural selection” is an unproven speculation. NS just removes extremities and doesn’t play any role in creative evolution.