<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Income, IQ, and profession	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wildcard		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wildcard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common definition of intelligence is learning from experience. A better definition would be learning from someone else&#039;s experience. As an octogenarian, retired engineer/physicist with an involved medical history it is my considered experience based opinion that the doctors I have met as a patient are not too bright. Of course, they may be smarter than they&#039;re letting on while they collect kickbacks from the drug industry. But then, they are victims of the medical drug complex that controls their education and entry into the schools that generate them. Actually, it appears to me that doctors in general are not analytical, but rather trained to relate symptoms to pharmaceutical products. In any event after having figured this out, I opted out of the system, take no pharmaceutical drugs, and use my visits to doctors to obtain the necessary tests to keep track of my general condition. Other than that, a good organic food based diet, exercise and generous use of supplements seems to work well. Additionally, Internet based information gathering keeps the mind stimulated. To wit: I pose Larry&#039;s Law -- if information can be ignored or misunderstood, it will be.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common definition of intelligence is learning from experience. A better definition would be learning from someone else&#8217;s experience. As an octogenarian, retired engineer/physicist with an involved medical history it is my considered experience based opinion that the doctors I have met as a patient are not too bright. Of course, they may be smarter than they&#8217;re letting on while they collect kickbacks from the drug industry. But then, they are victims of the medical drug complex that controls their education and entry into the schools that generate them. Actually, it appears to me that doctors in general are not analytical, but rather trained to relate symptoms to pharmaceutical products. In any event after having figured this out, I opted out of the system, take no pharmaceutical drugs, and use my visits to doctors to obtain the necessary tests to keep track of my general condition. Other than that, a good organic food based diet, exercise and generous use of supplements seems to work well. Additionally, Internet based information gathering keeps the mind stimulated. To wit: I pose Larry&#8217;s Law &#8212; if information can be ignored or misunderstood, it will be.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: greg		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543482</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.ncsu.edu/chass/philo/GRE%20Scores%20by%20Intended%20Graduate%20Major.htm

The above link takes you to the GRE data, which while not a pure IQ test per se, seems to match up rather well with IQ data.  When I took the GRE in the late 80&#039;s they showed roughly the same data, teachers were the lowest rated of anyone going to grad school.  Back then the analytical was multiple choice vice written, so engineers like me tended to do well and quantitative and analytical (I got 800 on both) and then my verbal was off, like 680 I think.  

anyway, that correlates to an IQ on the high side of 160 for me.  my mom, a nurse, scores around 145 on IQ tests.  

At least in America, nurses and engineers seem to draw high IQ people who are not to the manor born, while lawyers and doctors tend to be more born to money.

Funny thing I just saw about the Law Schools in CA, they are adding .3333 to all students GPA so they can get a better job.  The argument being, they paid $150,000 for a law degree, they better be able to get a job.  So there you have it, law school particularly is seen as a way to buy your kid a good job.  Can&#039;t imagine an engineering school doing that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ncsu.edu/chass/philo/GRE%20Scores%20by%20Intended%20Graduate%20Major.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ncsu.edu/chass/philo/GRE%20Scores%20by%20Intended%20Graduate%20Major.htm</a></p>
<p>The above link takes you to the GRE data, which while not a pure IQ test per se, seems to match up rather well with IQ data.  When I took the GRE in the late 80&#8217;s they showed roughly the same data, teachers were the lowest rated of anyone going to grad school.  Back then the analytical was multiple choice vice written, so engineers like me tended to do well and quantitative and analytical (I got 800 on both) and then my verbal was off, like 680 I think.  </p>
<p>anyway, that correlates to an IQ on the high side of 160 for me.  my mom, a nurse, scores around 145 on IQ tests.  </p>
<p>At least in America, nurses and engineers seem to draw high IQ people who are not to the manor born, while lawyers and doctors tend to be more born to money.</p>
<p>Funny thing I just saw about the Law Schools in CA, they are adding .3333 to all students GPA so they can get a better job.  The argument being, they paid $150,000 for a law degree, they better be able to get a job.  So there you have it, law school particularly is seen as a way to buy your kid a good job.  Can&#8217;t imagine an engineering school doing that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another source from an American research journal on occupational IQ; as far as professions go, engineers appear to be at the top.


        SCORES ON THE WECHSLER BELLEVUE SCALE IN RELATION TO OCCUPATION             
     Group             N         Range     10%   Q-1   Median    Q-3     90%        
Engineers -             52
    Full                        116-148    121   127     133     135     140
    Verbal                      110-144    120   125     130     136     140
    Performance                 114-145    119   124     129     133     137
Professionals I -       52
    Full                        113-141    120   126     132     134     137
    Verbal                      109-144    121   126     134     136     141
    Performance                  99-137    115   119     124     129     132
Educators -             45
    Full                        104-141    118   123     129     134     137
    Verbal                      106-143    112   123     129     134     137
    Performance                  95-139    112   117     125     132     135
Professionals II -      61
    Full                        106-143    117   123     128     133     138
    Verbal                      112-143    117   123     128     132     137
    Performance                  94-141    111   118     124     129     136
Teachers -             421
    Full                         94-152    114   120     126     132     137
    Verbal                       94-145    113   120     126     131     137
    Performance                  83-161    108   115     123     130     134
Social Service -        66
    Full                        108-145    117   121     125     132     135
    Verbal                      105-145    114   118     124     133     136
    Performance                  95-146    106   113     122     129     134
Managers -             134
    Full                         92-146    113   120     125     130     136
    Verbal                       81-140    110   118     124     131     135
    Performance                  91-154    109   115     122     129     135
Nurses -               191
    Full                         93-141    113   118     124     128     132
    Verbal                       99-143    110   115     121     127     131
    Performance                  78-145    102   114     125     130     136
Arts -                  62
    Full                         74-147    109   117     124     131     138
    Verbal                       73-142    107   115     120     127     136
    Performance                  78-145    102   114     125     130     136
Sales -                153
    Full                         95-142    105   112     122     128     132
    Verbal                       93-143    101   111     120     128     133
    Performance                  93-144    103   111     118     125     130
Secretaries -          107
    Full                         92-135    108   114     121     125     130
    Verbal                       94-134    107   114     120     125     130
    Performance                  88-136    102   108     118     126     129
Bookkeepers -           55
    Full                         99-137    105   109     117     125     129
    Verbal                       98-141    102   107     115     125     129
    Performance                  94-141    101   107     114     120     125
Clerks -               128
    Full                         74-140     97   105     116     122     131
    Verbal                       76-145     99   106     117     122     127
    Performance                  69-140     94   103     114     121     129
Office Workers -        62
    Full                         88-139     99   108     116     123     128
    Verbal                       89-135     98   104     113     122     127
    Performance                  81-141     97   106     115     124     128
Skilled Labor -        107
    Full                         87-139    103   110     115     123     127
    Verbal                       82-136     98   106     114     120     127
    Performance                  93-136    102   108     117     122     126
Personal Service -      57
    Full                         54-130     79    92     106     113     122
    Verbal                       59-132     80    90     104     115     121
    Performance                  54-129     84    99     105     114     119        

Professionals I -- physicians, dentists, lawyers
Educators -- college deans and instructors, high school and grammar school principals
Professionals II -- pharmacists, accountants
Social Service -- social workers, clergy
Managers -- small business owners, retail store managers, office managers, foremen
     business executives, small manufacturers.
Arts -- singers, dancers, musicians, actors, artists, designers, commercial artists
Sales -- all inside and outside sales people, wholesale and retail
Office Workers -- stenographers, comptometer operators, typists, receptionists,
     telephone switchboard operators
Skilled Labor -- machinists, automobile and aircraft mechanics, radio and television
     repairmen, plumbers, electricians
Personal Service -- barbers, beauticians, waiters, food handlers, soda fountain
     attendants, domestics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another source from an American research journal on occupational IQ; as far as professions go, engineers appear to be at the top.</p>
<p>        SCORES ON THE WECHSLER BELLEVUE SCALE IN RELATION TO OCCUPATION<br />
     Group             N         Range     10%   Q-1   Median    Q-3     90%<br />
Engineers &#8211;             52<br />
    Full                        116-148    121   127     133     135     140<br />
    Verbal                      110-144    120   125     130     136     140<br />
    Performance                 114-145    119   124     129     133     137<br />
Professionals I &#8211;       52<br />
    Full                        113-141    120   126     132     134     137<br />
    Verbal                      109-144    121   126     134     136     141<br />
    Performance                  99-137    115   119     124     129     132<br />
Educators &#8211;             45<br />
    Full                        104-141    118   123     129     134     137<br />
    Verbal                      106-143    112   123     129     134     137<br />
    Performance                  95-139    112   117     125     132     135<br />
Professionals II &#8211;      61<br />
    Full                        106-143    117   123     128     133     138<br />
    Verbal                      112-143    117   123     128     132     137<br />
    Performance                  94-141    111   118     124     129     136<br />
Teachers &#8211;             421<br />
    Full                         94-152    114   120     126     132     137<br />
    Verbal                       94-145    113   120     126     131     137<br />
    Performance                  83-161    108   115     123     130     134<br />
Social Service &#8211;        66<br />
    Full                        108-145    117   121     125     132     135<br />
    Verbal                      105-145    114   118     124     133     136<br />
    Performance                  95-146    106   113     122     129     134<br />
Managers &#8211;             134<br />
    Full                         92-146    113   120     125     130     136<br />
    Verbal                       81-140    110   118     124     131     135<br />
    Performance                  91-154    109   115     122     129     135<br />
Nurses &#8211;               191<br />
    Full                         93-141    113   118     124     128     132<br />
    Verbal                       99-143    110   115     121     127     131<br />
    Performance                  78-145    102   114     125     130     136<br />
Arts &#8211;                  62<br />
    Full                         74-147    109   117     124     131     138<br />
    Verbal                       73-142    107   115     120     127     136<br />
    Performance                  78-145    102   114     125     130     136<br />
Sales &#8211;                153<br />
    Full                         95-142    105   112     122     128     132<br />
    Verbal                       93-143    101   111     120     128     133<br />
    Performance                  93-144    103   111     118     125     130<br />
Secretaries &#8211;          107<br />
    Full                         92-135    108   114     121     125     130<br />
    Verbal                       94-134    107   114     120     125     130<br />
    Performance                  88-136    102   108     118     126     129<br />
Bookkeepers &#8211;           55<br />
    Full                         99-137    105   109     117     125     129<br />
    Verbal                       98-141    102   107     115     125     129<br />
    Performance                  94-141    101   107     114     120     125<br />
Clerks &#8211;               128<br />
    Full                         74-140     97   105     116     122     131<br />
    Verbal                       76-145     99   106     117     122     127<br />
    Performance                  69-140     94   103     114     121     129<br />
Office Workers &#8211;        62<br />
    Full                         88-139     99   108     116     123     128<br />
    Verbal                       89-135     98   104     113     122     127<br />
    Performance                  81-141     97   106     115     124     128<br />
Skilled Labor &#8211;        107<br />
    Full                         87-139    103   110     115     123     127<br />
    Verbal                       82-136     98   106     114     120     127<br />
    Performance                  93-136    102   108     117     122     126<br />
Personal Service &#8211;      57<br />
    Full                         54-130     79    92     106     113     122<br />
    Verbal                       59-132     80    90     104     115     121<br />
    Performance                  54-129     84    99     105     114     119        </p>
<p>Professionals I &#8212; physicians, dentists, lawyers<br />
Educators &#8212; college deans and instructors, high school and grammar school principals<br />
Professionals II &#8212; pharmacists, accountants<br />
Social Service &#8212; social workers, clergy<br />
Managers &#8212; small business owners, retail store managers, office managers, foremen<br />
     business executives, small manufacturers.<br />
Arts &#8212; singers, dancers, musicians, actors, artists, designers, commercial artists<br />
Sales &#8212; all inside and outside sales people, wholesale and retail<br />
Office Workers &#8212; stenographers, comptometer operators, typists, receptionists,<br />
     telephone switchboard operators<br />
Skilled Labor &#8212; machinists, automobile and aircraft mechanics, radio and television<br />
     repairmen, plumbers, electricians<br />
Personal Service &#8212; barbers, beauticians, waiters, food handlers, soda fountain<br />
     attendants, domestics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Rostan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543480</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Rostan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, we do know how to increase all components of IQ several standard deviations well into advanced old age.  Fluid intelligence as well as learned.  Terman&#039;s high IQ kids had lost as average of 22 IQ points by age 40.  Which may explain their relative lack of success winning Nobel Prizes.

The Durham, England school District experiments showed that taking fish oil capsules thrice a day improved the behavior and academic performance of most students, some up to three grades, in three months, and that this improvement continued as long as the pre-school and 11 to 14 year old kids continued taking the capsules.

Thrice daily capsules are not necessary if 1-2 T fish oil, preferably lemon or cherry flavored cod liver oil with vitamins A and D, is mixed with 1/4 cup nonfat yogurt to chemically bind the oil to the proteins in the yogurt and thereby bypass early destruction in the liver.  This basically is the Dr. Johanna Budwig diet developed in the 1950s using flax oil to successfully prevent and reverse such chronic diseases as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc.  

It works because the bad fats our rotten diets allow to dominate our cell walls are replaced with good omega-3 fats, greatly improving cell breathing - nutrients in, and garbage out - helping our organs gain maximum operating efficiency, with the ability to reverse disease.

Lecithin (and the B vitamins) has long been known to increase short term memory.  And coenzyme Q10 has been known for over 30 years to increase longevity, exercise tolerance, and problem solving.  

Earlier this decade, Japan&#039;s Dr. Mae developed a way to stabilize ubiquinol, the form of Q10 that circulates in the blood, allowing a mere 50 mg capsule to do the work of up to 400 mg and be available all day long, not just  few hours for regular Q10.

Ubiquinol enormously increases the mitochondria energy output of every cell in the body, helping the organs of which they are a part to gain maximum operating efficiency.  

A daily 6-8 minute sprint on foot or bicycle will help maximize effectiveness by boosting heart, lung, and muscle function and getting oxygen to the brain.

Other supplements are helpful to particular conditions, but sprinting, ubiquinol, and fish or flax oil are helpful to all and supply the biggest physical and intellectual returns by far for the buck.  Further, their regular use is highly likely to avoid or greatly reduce the need to use the healthcare system.  For this 77 year old, that is particularly important, as otherwise, under the proposed congressional healthcare plans, a trip to the doctor threatens denial of needed treatments and early death.
While no effort is needed to see across the board improvements, the joy of exercising the newfound powers conferred by ubiquinol, fish/flax oil, and sprinting can only greatly expand them.  

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we do know how to increase all components of IQ several standard deviations well into advanced old age.  Fluid intelligence as well as learned.  Terman&#8217;s high IQ kids had lost as average of 22 IQ points by age 40.  Which may explain their relative lack of success winning Nobel Prizes.</p>
<p>The Durham, England school District experiments showed that taking fish oil capsules thrice a day improved the behavior and academic performance of most students, some up to three grades, in three months, and that this improvement continued as long as the pre-school and 11 to 14 year old kids continued taking the capsules.</p>
<p>Thrice daily capsules are not necessary if 1-2 T fish oil, preferably lemon or cherry flavored cod liver oil with vitamins A and D, is mixed with 1/4 cup nonfat yogurt to chemically bind the oil to the proteins in the yogurt and thereby bypass early destruction in the liver.  This basically is the Dr. Johanna Budwig diet developed in the 1950s using flax oil to successfully prevent and reverse such chronic diseases as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc.  </p>
<p>It works because the bad fats our rotten diets allow to dominate our cell walls are replaced with good omega-3 fats, greatly improving cell breathing &#8211; nutrients in, and garbage out &#8211; helping our organs gain maximum operating efficiency, with the ability to reverse disease.</p>
<p>Lecithin (and the B vitamins) has long been known to increase short term memory.  And coenzyme Q10 has been known for over 30 years to increase longevity, exercise tolerance, and problem solving.  </p>
<p>Earlier this decade, Japan&#8217;s Dr. Mae developed a way to stabilize ubiquinol, the form of Q10 that circulates in the blood, allowing a mere 50 mg capsule to do the work of up to 400 mg and be available all day long, not just  few hours for regular Q10.</p>
<p>Ubiquinol enormously increases the mitochondria energy output of every cell in the body, helping the organs of which they are a part to gain maximum operating efficiency.  </p>
<p>A daily 6-8 minute sprint on foot or bicycle will help maximize effectiveness by boosting heart, lung, and muscle function and getting oxygen to the brain.</p>
<p>Other supplements are helpful to particular conditions, but sprinting, ubiquinol, and fish or flax oil are helpful to all and supply the biggest physical and intellectual returns by far for the buck.  Further, their regular use is highly likely to avoid or greatly reduce the need to use the healthcare system.  For this 77 year old, that is particularly important, as otherwise, under the proposed congressional healthcare plans, a trip to the doctor threatens denial of needed treatments and early death.<br />
While no effort is needed to see across the board improvements, the joy of exercising the newfound powers conferred by ubiquinol, fish/flax oil, and sprinting can only greatly expand them.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DuWayne: Give MS a break.  You have not met these guys in Nebraska. (Well, neither have I but I have it on good authority ...)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DuWayne: Give MS a break.  You have not met these guys in Nebraska. (Well, neither have I but I have it on good authority &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DuWayne		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DuWayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When there are inferences about IQ, it is generally a good bet that one can take the results with a grain of salt.  While there are a few things that IQ is a reasonable measure of, actual intelligence is not one of them.  

I would tend to think - and if I end up in academia, I may get the chance to actually test my hypothesis - that rather than intelligence going down as we age, we simply become too distracted to reasonably take the damned test.  Given time and focus, I end up with one score - just taking one without such focus, it comes out lower.  And since I have gone back to school, I am able to score about where I was at thirteen.

But really, even if I am incorrect, given what we understand about IQ now, there is little reason to give a whole lot of credence to studies that integrate IQ.  Unless the goal is to seek out factors that will level the playing field, all it is doing is restating the obvious - people with certain advantages in life are going to manage better on IQ tests.  The thing is, we know this is the case and we even have a pretty good idea what to emphasize with children to level the field - reading to and with children - encouraging them to write - talking to them - encourage them to listen to people talking and encourage them to &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; about what has been communicated to them.  

Now when someone wants to do a study on &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;, we have something useful coming out of the IQ discussion.  Until then, it is just more of the same old fucking bullshit.

And Madscientist, that was more than asshole - that was fucking obnoxious, apology or not.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there are inferences about IQ, it is generally a good bet that one can take the results with a grain of salt.  While there are a few things that IQ is a reasonable measure of, actual intelligence is not one of them.  </p>
<p>I would tend to think &#8211; and if I end up in academia, I may get the chance to actually test my hypothesis &#8211; that rather than intelligence going down as we age, we simply become too distracted to reasonably take the damned test.  Given time and focus, I end up with one score &#8211; just taking one without such focus, it comes out lower.  And since I have gone back to school, I am able to score about where I was at thirteen.</p>
<p>But really, even if I am incorrect, given what we understand about IQ now, there is little reason to give a whole lot of credence to studies that integrate IQ.  Unless the goal is to seek out factors that will level the playing field, all it is doing is restating the obvious &#8211; people with certain advantages in life are going to manage better on IQ tests.  The thing is, we know this is the case and we even have a pretty good idea what to emphasize with children to level the field &#8211; reading to and with children &#8211; encouraging them to write &#8211; talking to them &#8211; encourage them to listen to people talking and encourage them to <i>think</i> about what has been communicated to them.  </p>
<p>Now when someone wants to do a study on <i>that</i>, we have something useful coming out of the IQ discussion.  Until then, it is just more of the same old fucking bullshit.</p>
<p>And Madscientist, that was more than asshole &#8211; that was fucking obnoxious, apology or not.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: other Greg		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[other Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You go on a fishing expedition.
You get a boatload of red-herring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You go on a fishing expedition.<br />
You get a boatload of red-herring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Quiet Desperation		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quiet Desperation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Oh, I also grew up knowing the &quot;garbage collector&quot; but these days I&#039;m told the guy is a &quot;sanitary engineer&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

And, curiously, a garbage collection is now a computer science term. :-) Things have come full circle, or... something. An infinite loop perhaps. I&#039;m very tired.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, I also grew up knowing the &#8220;garbage collector&#8221; but these days I&#8217;m told the guy is a &#8220;sanitary engineer&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>And, curiously, a garbage collection is now a computer science term. 🙂 Things have come full circle, or&#8230; something. An infinite loop perhaps. I&#8217;m very tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Quiet Desperation		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quiet Desperation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great. I just spent an 80 hour week getting a 25 million gate ASIC design working because I was able to visualize nearly the whole thing in my head at once and figure out the glitch, and I get an &quot;engineers am teh dumb&quot; story. ;-)

Yeah, I&#039;m snarking, but still. Sheesh. We&#039;re so picked on despite giving the world the iPhone, the Hoover Dam and the Audi TT RS. Others are probably right about the UK version of the word engineer, though. Although I wouldn&#039;t bad mouth doctors or lawyers. Well, OK, maybe lawyers, but not doctors. I&#039;d totally be a Dr. Gregory House if I became a doctor and get sued for rudeness every week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. I just spent an 80 hour week getting a 25 million gate ASIC design working because I was able to visualize nearly the whole thing in my head at once and figure out the glitch, and I get an &#8220;engineers am teh dumb&#8221; story. 😉</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m snarking, but still. Sheesh. We&#8217;re so picked on despite giving the world the iPhone, the Hoover Dam and the Audi TT RS. Others are probably right about the UK version of the word engineer, though. Although I wouldn&#8217;t bad mouth doctors or lawyers. Well, OK, maybe lawyers, but not doctors. I&#8217;d totally be a Dr. Gregory House if I became a doctor and get sued for rudeness every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MadScientist		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadScientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/29/income-iq-and-profession/#comment-543474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Stellar Sasquatch:  That&#039;s why I was asking about what the authors meant by &quot;engineer&quot;; in the UK that typically means &quot;auto mechanic&quot; and in 1970s Ohio that meant &quot;train driver&quot; although we&#039;d usually say &quot;locomotive engineer&quot;.  Even with &quot;nurse&quot;, what I once knew as a &quot;nurse&quot; has long been called a &quot;registered nurse&quot; as opposed to the &quot;nurse&quot; which is not on the registry of nurses and whom we used to call &quot;orderlies&quot;.  Many engineering professions at the start of the period being looked at weren&#039;t even recognized as engineers in those days - for example, electronics engineers and computer engineers.  So I have numerous questions on terminology based on my own US bias, but I&#039;m pretty sure that electronics and computer engineers didn&#039;t exist by that name around 1956. Oh, I also grew up knowing the &quot;garbage collector&quot; but these days I&#039;m told the guy is a &quot;sanitary engineer&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stellar Sasquatch:  That&#8217;s why I was asking about what the authors meant by &#8220;engineer&#8221;; in the UK that typically means &#8220;auto mechanic&#8221; and in 1970s Ohio that meant &#8220;train driver&#8221; although we&#8217;d usually say &#8220;locomotive engineer&#8221;.  Even with &#8220;nurse&#8221;, what I once knew as a &#8220;nurse&#8221; has long been called a &#8220;registered nurse&#8221; as opposed to the &#8220;nurse&#8221; which is not on the registry of nurses and whom we used to call &#8220;orderlies&#8221;.  Many engineering professions at the start of the period being looked at weren&#8217;t even recognized as engineers in those days &#8211; for example, electronics engineers and computer engineers.  So I have numerous questions on terminology based on my own US bias, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that electronics and computer engineers didn&#8217;t exist by that name around 1956. Oh, I also grew up knowing the &#8220;garbage collector&#8221; but these days I&#8217;m told the guy is a &#8220;sanitary engineer&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
