<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Chrome 64 Bit for Linux	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Thibeault		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Thibeault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello from Chromium!

Mike, I saw .deb packages for i386 architecture at https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa when I downloaded the amd64 stuff.  Download all the parts, then do sudo dpkg -i *.deb from the folder you downloaded them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello from Chromium!</p>
<p>Mike, I saw .deb packages for i386 architecture at <a href="https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa" rel="nofollow ugc">https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa</a> when I downloaded the amd64 stuff.  Download all the parts, then do sudo dpkg -i *.deb from the folder you downloaded them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Thibeault		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Thibeault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait, Mike, are you saying they posted 64-bit to the exclusion of 32-bit??  

I haven&#039;t even looked into this yet, only tried Chrome briefly on Windows at work, but I should do so right now -- I&#039;m sitting at a 64 bit Ubuntu box at the moment.  No time like the present!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, Mike, are you saying they posted 64-bit to the exclusion of 32-bit??  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t even looked into this yet, only tried Chrome briefly on Windows at work, but I should do so right now &#8212; I&#8217;m sitting at a 64 bit Ubuntu box at the moment.  No time like the present!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan J		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t worry, Mike, I&#039;ll build you a nice 64-bit system.

I&#039;ve been using the 64-bit Chromium dev build for a few hours now, and I like it. Nice rendering, and very small RAM/CPU footprint. It&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; Google Chrome, but built on Chromium just the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, Mike, I&#8217;ll build you a nice 64-bit system.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using the 64-bit Chromium dev build for a few hours now, and I like it. Nice rendering, and very small RAM/CPU footprint. It&#8217;s not <em>exactly</em> Google Chrome, but built on Chromium just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Haubrich		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Haubrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What aoubt us 32 bit guys?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What aoubt us 32 bit guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan J		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/25/google-chrome-64-bit-for-linux/#comment-543067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this is only the beginning of a trend we&#039;re likely to see over the next several months. Google&#039;s application development for Linux has been lagging behind (SketchUp, anyone?). Their announcement of a planned Google OS&#8212;based on Linux&#8212;puts a burden on their developers to have their own applications available for their OS. Failing to have those applications ready would look rather&#8230; pathetic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is only the beginning of a trend we&#8217;re likely to see over the next several months. Google&#8217;s application development for Linux has been lagging behind (SketchUp, anyone?). Their announcement of a planned Google OS&mdash;based on Linux&mdash;puts a burden on their developers to have their own applications available for their OS. Failing to have those applications ready would look rather&hellip; pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
