Comments on: Skepchick. n. https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/ Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: AnnieB https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542207 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:16 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542207 I’ve been reading through this and trying to figure out who is patronizing what, and as far as I can tell it is Dr. Laden making the claim, based on test scores in his classes, that girls outdo boys on grades. Is that really what we are arguing about here? I’m sure there are subjects where this is true and he apparently teaches one of these.

Besides, everyone knows that chicks are smarter than …

]]> By: Enoch https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542206 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:26:49 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542206 This post should be retitled “Troll Alley” or something.

]]> By: Nathan Myers https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542205 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:19:13 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542205 Greg: Patronizing gets old. It’s your blog, though, so I’m not complaining (hey, go wild!), just noting.

]]> By: Jason Thibeault https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542204 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:57:14 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542204 If I might say so, you’re just that irresistible, Stephanie. Err, as a target, I mean. How could a troll NOT attack a smart, confident girl on the interwebs? I mean, that’s practically in their job description!

]]> By: Greg Laden https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542203 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:52:35 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542203 What gets old, Nathan? I’m not following you.

]]> By: Stephanie Z https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542202 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:46:47 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542202 I know, CyberLizard. Do you think I’m actively encouraging the obsessiveness, or am I just that irresistible?

]]> By: bug_girl https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542201 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:40:47 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542201 what the…

wow.

Sigh.

]]> By: CyberLizard https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542200 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:34:40 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542200 Wow, Stephanie, you have the most ardent followers 😉 I love hanging out here, you find a whole different class of trolls.

]]> By: Nathan Myers https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542199 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:12:00 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542199 Greg: Still at it, I see. It gets old.

SZ: So, it’s back to the name-calling. I didn’t ask for your chances and have no desire for your redemption.

]]> By: Stephanie Z https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542198 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:00:01 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/08/17/skepchick-n/#comment-542198 Oh, and Nathan, they’re called “skeptics.”

]]>