<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: JC = Thumbs Up 4 Sotomayor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/28/jc-thumbs-up-4-sotomayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/28/jc-thumbs-up-4-sotomayor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: D. C. Sessions		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/28/jc-thumbs-up-4-sotomayor/#comment-540646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. Sessions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/07/28/jc-thumbs-up-4-sotomayor/#comment-540646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; would have voted against her, but at least it would have been for something other than making life hard for the President.

I would have voted against her for her (horrible) record on civil liberties -- she&#039;s already well on her way to being the most authoritarian Justice on the Court, which given recent appointments is going to be a hard-fought race.

On the other hand, she looks to be a brilliant detail jurist -- the perfect person for a Federal District Court.  Pity she couldn&#039;t have stayed there and a greater pity that the President didn&#039;t exercise a bit less caution in appointing someone with a real vision to the USSC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, <b>I</b> would have voted against her, but at least it would have been for something other than making life hard for the President.</p>
<p>I would have voted against her for her (horrible) record on civil liberties &#8212; she&#8217;s already well on her way to being the most authoritarian Justice on the Court, which given recent appointments is going to be a hard-fought race.</p>
<p>On the other hand, she looks to be a brilliant detail jurist &#8212; the perfect person for a Federal District Court.  Pity she couldn&#8217;t have stayed there and a greater pity that the President didn&#8217;t exercise a bit less caution in appointing someone with a real vision to the USSC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
