<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Origins of the Evil Eye and Horticultural Fertility Cults?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nathan Myers		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/#comment-540154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/#comment-540154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds like the expression &quot;symbolic act&quot; has itself leaked away meaning.  Is growing a wattle a symbolic act, for a bird?  How is this necessarily different from wearing earrings?  (Yes, they could be crosses, but Madonna made crosses trendy and meaningless only a few years back.)  Let&#039;s not confuse groupthink with real scientific consensus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the expression &#8220;symbolic act&#8221; has itself leaked away meaning.  Is growing a wattle a symbolic act, for a bird?  How is this necessarily different from wearing earrings?  (Yes, they could be crosses, but Madonna made crosses trendy and meaningless only a few years back.)  Let&#8217;s not confuse groupthink with real scientific consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D. C. Sessions		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/#comment-540153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. Sessions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/07/21/the-origins-of-the-evil-eye-an-1/#comment-540153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;ResearchBlogging.orgIt has become axiomatic that the use of adornment by humans is some sort of symbolic act&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ObLogicGeek:

From the sound of it, this point has become a lot stronger than &quot;axiomatic.&quot;  It&#039;s not assumed without evidence; indeed, it seems to have a good bit of evidence supporting it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ResearchBlogging.orgIt has become axiomatic that the use of adornment by humans is some sort of symbolic act</p></blockquote>
<p>ObLogicGeek:</p>
<p>From the sound of it, this point has become a lot stronger than &#8220;axiomatic.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not assumed without evidence; indeed, it seems to have a good bit of evidence supporting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
