<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Boot Time (Windows vs. Linux)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dunc		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Is there some rule that I&#039;m not allowed to express a thought of my own? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course not. But that&#039;s not exactly how the sentence &quot;Linux in Exile has refined the empirical test of which operating system boots more often&quot; reads, at least to me. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is there some rule that I&#8217;m not allowed to express a thought of my own? </p></blockquote>
<p>Of course not. But that&#8217;s not exactly how the sentence &#8220;Linux in Exile has refined the empirical test of which operating system boots more often&#8221; reads, at least to me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Zvan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Zvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Dunc:

Since similar software packages are available for Windows and Linux, written by different communities. I would posit that, since less &#039;shitty software&#039; is written for Linux, this is still a problem with Windows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dunc:</p>
<p>Since similar software packages are available for Windows and Linux, written by different communities. I would posit that, since less &#8216;shitty software&#8217; is written for Linux, this is still a problem with Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;The linked post says nothing at all about &quot;which operating system boots more often&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Is there some rule that I&#039;m not allowed to express a thought of my own?  

Dunc, your concept of where crappiness comes from (sheer numbers) is deeply flawed, IMHO.  If I may express one, thank you.

Jeesh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The linked post says nothing at all about &#8220;which operating system boots more often&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Is there some rule that I&#8217;m not allowed to express a thought of my own?  </p>
<p>Dunc, your concept of where crappiness comes from (sheer numbers) is deeply flawed, IMHO.  If I may express one, thank you.</p>
<p>Jeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: davem		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I spent last night fixing my uncle&#039;s windoze system. The main problem turned out to be some dodgy anti-virus software which ground the system to a halt as it powered up. Took an age to even realise it was running (2% CPU usage, no memory problems, and still it took 2 minutes just to get a response to hitting the &#039;windows&#039; button). Pathetic.

There&#039;s the practical difference. On a domestic system that gets turned on and off every day, Windoze spends an age loading up unnecessary shit that shouldn&#039;t even need to be there. ..and always just when you need it fast.

In the end, after 5 or 6 reboots, the thing booted in two minutes; it had been &lt;i&gt;fifteen&lt;/i&gt;. Next time, I&#039;m taking an Ubuntu live CD with me...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent last night fixing my uncle&#8217;s windoze system. The main problem turned out to be some dodgy anti-virus software which ground the system to a halt as it powered up. Took an age to even realise it was running (2% CPU usage, no memory problems, and still it took 2 minutes just to get a response to hitting the &#8216;windows&#8217; button). Pathetic.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the practical difference. On a domestic system that gets turned on and off every day, Windoze spends an age loading up unnecessary shit that shouldn&#8217;t even need to be there. ..and always just when you need it fast.</p>
<p>In the end, after 5 or 6 reboots, the thing booted in two minutes; it had been <i>fifteen</i>. Next time, I&#8217;m taking an Ubuntu live CD with me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dunc		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/17/boot-time-windows-vs-linux/#comment-538118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The linked post says &lt;i&gt;nothing at all&lt;/i&gt; about &quot;which operating system boots &lt;i&gt;more often&lt;/i&gt;&quot; - all it talks about is boot &lt;i&gt;time&lt;/i&gt;. Now, while I&#039;ll certainly grant that Linux boots a darn sight faster than my Win2k3 Server, since I can&#039;t remember the last time I actually had to reboot the thing, it doesn&#039;t really matter, does it?

The trick to not having to constantly reboot for routine maintenance turned out to be uninstalling Adobe Acrobat Reader - that was my main cause of maintenance reboots. Like I&#039;ve said before, the fact that lots of people write really, &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; shitty software for Windows is not actually the fault of the OS itself - it&#039;s a factor of its popularity. If Linux had the same market penetration, you can bet that just as many people would be writing equally shitty software for it too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The linked post says <i>nothing at all</i> about &#8220;which operating system boots <i>more often</i>&#8221; &#8211; all it talks about is boot <i>time</i>. Now, while I&#8217;ll certainly grant that Linux boots a darn sight faster than my Win2k3 Server, since I can&#8217;t remember the last time I actually had to reboot the thing, it doesn&#8217;t really matter, does it?</p>
<p>The trick to not having to constantly reboot for routine maintenance turned out to be uninstalling Adobe Acrobat Reader &#8211; that was my main cause of maintenance reboots. Like I&#8217;ve said before, the fact that lots of people write really, <i>really</i> shitty software for Windows is not actually the fault of the OS itself &#8211; it&#8217;s a factor of its popularity. If Linux had the same market penetration, you can bet that just as many people would be writing equally shitty software for it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
