<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Bad Astronomer Phil Plait on Skeptically Speaking	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Philippe Masse		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/#comment-538091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Masse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/#comment-538091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[have read a heck of a lot of science since 1962 (was 13), so am entitled to vent my rage.. in favor of science and against censoreship or anti-science. As in Carl Sagan counting out 90% of USA citizens as anti-science. Of course have written sci-fi; am a generalist, but mostly astronomy.
  Hoping that Venus Express will debunk ... Carl Sagan! Cause no proof has been good for the super-greenhouse since 1978, when Pioneer witnessed lots of sulfur (volcanoes).
   Deuterium (HDO) is 120 timmes too prevalent; temperature 350 C higher than Mercury AVERAGE heat; 167 super-volcanoes but how many are active? Moreover, continuous lightning can explain Venus&#039; slight glow (Patrick Moore)? and whole-atmosphere circum-navigation in 4 days is 60 times swifter than ultra-slow rotation of -243 days. Reduction in atmosphere, hydrogen escapes, radioactive Argon, nothing goes towards Sagan&#039;s theory. All in favor of mine: titanic impact, so powerful it still makes the massive atmosph crazy with &#039;ergs&#039; --  a 2000 mile wide moon is only force that can modify rotation of Venus, while it almost totally breaks up the crust. Under that crust is a fantastic amount of GAS. Only way to have a hundred bars of &#039;air&#039;. 
   The great proof of my catastrophe? Venus producing 10 to 15% energy more than it receives from Sun. Or heat decreasin a bit - like 5 degrees a century. Pettit-Nicholson bolometrics can help us, since 1922, to ascertain heat imbalance, maybe. And pardon my English, it&#039;s my second language. Only 99% bilingual. But am sure of my &#039;statictics&#039; and know all the fuss with Sagan, Rasool-de-Berg, Velikovsky, Hoyle and Drake among others. Thanks for lending an ear. Am 60 but lover of all science. Oh! &amp; the real proof on Moon walking: The hated Soviets sent 3 robots (1970-1976) that brought back a pound or so of regolith, glass beads and cinders. The same darned thing all the Apollos came back with. No big rocks of course... P.M.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have read a heck of a lot of science since 1962 (was 13), so am entitled to vent my rage.. in favor of science and against censoreship or anti-science. As in Carl Sagan counting out 90% of USA citizens as anti-science. Of course have written sci-fi; am a generalist, but mostly astronomy.<br />
  Hoping that Venus Express will debunk &#8230; Carl Sagan! Cause no proof has been good for the super-greenhouse since 1978, when Pioneer witnessed lots of sulfur (volcanoes).<br />
   Deuterium (HDO) is 120 timmes too prevalent; temperature 350 C higher than Mercury AVERAGE heat; 167 super-volcanoes but how many are active? Moreover, continuous lightning can explain Venus&#8217; slight glow (Patrick Moore)? and whole-atmosphere circum-navigation in 4 days is 60 times swifter than ultra-slow rotation of -243 days. Reduction in atmosphere, hydrogen escapes, radioactive Argon, nothing goes towards Sagan&#8217;s theory. All in favor of mine: titanic impact, so powerful it still makes the massive atmosph crazy with &#8216;ergs&#8217; &#8212;  a 2000 mile wide moon is only force that can modify rotation of Venus, while it almost totally breaks up the crust. Under that crust is a fantastic amount of GAS. Only way to have a hundred bars of &#8216;air&#8217;.<br />
   The great proof of my catastrophe? Venus producing 10 to 15% energy more than it receives from Sun. Or heat decreasin a bit &#8211; like 5 degrees a century. Pettit-Nicholson bolometrics can help us, since 1922, to ascertain heat imbalance, maybe. And pardon my English, it&#8217;s my second language. Only 99% bilingual. But am sure of my &#8216;statictics&#8217; and know all the fuss with Sagan, Rasool-de-Berg, Velikovsky, Hoyle and Drake among others. Thanks for lending an ear. Am 60 but lover of all science. Oh! &#038; the real proof on Moon walking: The hated Soviets sent 3 robots (1970-1976) that brought back a pound or so of regolith, glass beads and cinders. The same darned thing all the Apollos came back with. No big rocks of course&#8230; P.M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Northernskeptic		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/#comment-538090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Northernskeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/15/the-bad-astronomer-phil-plait/#comment-538090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m usually the first caller into the show each episode, I challenge any listeners to beat me to the phones.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m usually the first caller into the show each episode, I challenge any listeners to beat me to the phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
