<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Swine Flu Alert Level Raised by WHO	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537855</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right now the swine flu is just regular flu, meaning that if it took th enormal course of &quot;seasonal&quot; (regular) flue then, for instance, about 30 or 40 thousand people would die in the US.

So yes, swine flue is serious because all flu is serious.

Now, out of season flu and flu with swine links, for various reasons, historically can becom extra bad.  In the case of the 1918 flu, which killed off a measurable percentage of our species, a swine-something else &#039;hybrid&#039; came around out of season and made lots of people sick but was kind of average for a flu, then went away, then came back and was as bad as anyone could imagine.  

The fear is that this will happen today, but we have some tools to deal with this that may help.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now the swine flu is just regular flu, meaning that if it took th enormal course of &#8220;seasonal&#8221; (regular) flue then, for instance, about 30 or 40 thousand people would die in the US.</p>
<p>So yes, swine flue is serious because all flu is serious.</p>
<p>Now, out of season flu and flu with swine links, for various reasons, historically can becom extra bad.  In the case of the 1918 flu, which killed off a measurable percentage of our species, a swine-something else &#8216;hybrid&#8217; came around out of season and made lots of people sick but was kind of average for a flu, then went away, then came back and was as bad as anyone could imagine.  </p>
<p>The fear is that this will happen today, but we have some tools to deal with this that may help.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: air monitoring		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[air monitoring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The flu has a way of evolving into deadlier more resistant strains, and that is what causes the most concern.  It seems like we should all eat less pork, thereby reducing hog factory populations, and that may slow down the evolution of future flu strains?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flu has a way of evolving into deadlier more resistant strains, and that is what causes the most concern.  It seems like we should all eat less pork, thereby reducing hog factory populations, and that may slow down the evolution of future flu strains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: long island gal		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[long island gal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At this kind of level declared by WHO, swine flu should not be taken for granted by people. This is totally serious. There may be some medicines to cure it, it would always be better to prevent it. Everything that we do must be done carefully because once we have it, we might not notice it and get worse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this kind of level declared by WHO, swine flu should not be taken for granted by people. This is totally serious. There may be some medicines to cure it, it would always be better to prevent it. Everything that we do must be done carefully because once we have it, we might not notice it and get worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chrystal K.		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537852</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrystal K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is swine flu anymore dangerous than the regular flu that we&#039;re used to?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is swine flu anymore dangerous than the regular flu that we&#8217;re used to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jackel:  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Probably not. Most likely people who got it the first time will be resistant to the second wave, and most likely a vaccine will be effective.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackel:  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Probably not. Most likely people who got it the first time will be resistant to the second wave, and most likely a vaccine will be effective.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jackal		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537850</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/11/swine-flu-alert-level-raised-b/#comment-537850</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;We are warned that a second wave of the flu may pass through areas that have already experienced a first wave.&quot;

Does this mean that the virus will mutate to the point that the antibodies of people who got it on the first wave will no longer be effective? If so, does that mean a vaccine will no longer be effective against the new virus?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are warned that a second wave of the flu may pass through areas that have already experienced a first wave.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does this mean that the virus will mutate to the point that the antibodies of people who got it on the first wave will no longer be effective? If so, does that mean a vaccine will no longer be effective against the new virus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
