Comments on: Norm Coleman: Against Democracy

By: Minnesota Central

Minnesota Central — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:24:53 +0000

This is the first test for the MN-Supreme Court. The ECC received the same request from Coleman asking for a delay until after Valentineâ??s Day â?¦ the Court ruled against it.

The test will be of Coleman financial supporter Supreme Court Associate Justice Christopher Dietzen — will he grant Colemanâ??s request or take the same approach that the ECC did ?

By: csrster

csrster — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:53:19 +0000

Is there anything to stop Franken trying to go straight to the SCOTUS to demand to be enrolled in the Senate immediately. The worst they could do is refuse to hear the case,right?

By: Greg Laden

Greg Laden — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:52:25 +0000

Monado: Must have been the links. You have been liberated.

By: Monado

Monado — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:44:04 +0000

Sorry, if he hasn’t gotten his arguments lined up in the last few months, too bad for him! What would happen if he had to make a quick decision in a state emergency?

Is the spam that bad or was it just that I put links into my last comment?

By: Joshua Zelinsky

Joshua Zelinsky — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:38:45 +0000

There is a point where one gives up trying to bother falsifying a hypothesis because all attempts to falsify it have so blatantly failed. We may be approaching that point with regard to the delaying hypothesis.

By: Joel

Joel — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:34:23 +0000

Coleman is playing games with our democracy. Preventing an opponent from being seated purely for political reasons. I hope the people of Minnesota punish both Coleman and the Republican party for stomping on our democracy.