Comments on: Why is teabagging the number one lookup on Urban Dictionary.com? https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/ Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:41:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: 'Tis Himself https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534231 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:41:51 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534231 How Maddox and Cox managed to talk about teabagging with more or less straight faces shows how professional they are.

Cox saying, “Everyone would want to teabag John McCain” was a LOL moment.

]]> By: Jason R https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534230 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:56:13 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534230 Oops forgot to paste in the video link for Rachel Maddow on MSNBC. She talks about the Tea-bagging.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/09/rachel-maddow-ana-marie-c_n_185445.html

]]> By: Jason R https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534229 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:39:21 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534229 LOL!

It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia.

Dennis: I’m sticking with the tea-bagging.
Mac: But tea-bagging doesn’t even leave a mark!
Dennis: Well, fine, I’ll dip my nuts in ink or something and then put it in his mouth– that make you happy?
Mac: Well… Yeah, actually, I think that’s a pretty good idea.

]]> By: xavier https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534228 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:46:29 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534228 I as well do not know what MENOF is.

]]> By: John Swindle https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534227 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:39:07 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534227 I had to go look up GLIU.

The toobz are awash with acronyms. Some just about explain themselves, but really, who can keep up?

i tried to find a decoding of MENOF – to no avail.

]]> By: Andrew https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534226 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:06:22 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534226 The whole thing is based on Sainthood and Martyrdom.

]]> By: Tony P https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534225 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:43:53 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534225 And in other news, the National Organization for Marriage has come up with the 2 Million for Marriage campaign. They chose 2M4M as the acronym. Not very bright are they?

]]> By: mrcreosote https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534224 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:58:11 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534224 and then on Thanksgiving they can hold turkey slapping parties

]]> By: Brian X https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534223 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:45:04 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534223 J-Dog:

Best explanation I’ve heard of the mentality is precisely what Not-Joe the Not-Plumber said — they view themselves as Potential Rich People and are faux-feathering their own nests to plan for the eventual gold strike. It’s got nothing to do with what they have and everything to do with what they’ve always been told they can get eventually.

]]> By: Jadehawk https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534222 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:34:10 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/13/why-is-teabagging-the-number-o/#comment-534222 this is undescribably awesome

]]>