<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Verdict on the new Dora the Explorah	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: teresa		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teresa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The original Dora had a backpack and a monkey, she had boot-like explorer shoes, sensible clothing, what looks to me like a watch with a compass built into it, a very sensible haircut, and a thirst for knowledge. When Julia saw the new Dora, she was a bit shocked. &quot;No backpack. What about the monkey? Pockets? How can you be an explorer with no pockets? They turned her into a Barbie.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original Dora had a backpack and a monkey, she had boot-like explorer shoes, sensible clothing, what looks to me like a watch with a compass built into it, a very sensible haircut, and a thirst for knowledge. When Julia saw the new Dora, she was a bit shocked. &#8220;No backpack. What about the monkey? Pockets? How can you be an explorer with no pockets? They turned her into a Barbie.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bob the explorer		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob the explorer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My 3 year old will be the ultimate test for this 
But Dora now matches her cousin Diego in style
And he still knows talking animals and has atalking bag

So there is hope - we&#039;ll see
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 3 year old will be the ultimate test for this<br />
But Dora now matches her cousin Diego in style<br />
And he still knows talking animals and has atalking bag</p>
<p>So there is hope &#8211; we&#8217;ll see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zachary		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zachary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so ugly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so ugly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sheril, excellent point about the monkey, I had not thought of that, and thanks for the links.  

And it is true that everything will depend on what Dora ultimately does.  I just hope she can take the pressure!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheril, excellent point about the monkey, I had not thought of that, and thanks for the links.  </p>
<p>And it is true that everything will depend on what Dora ultimately does.  I just hope she can take the pressure!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JosÃ©		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JosÃ©]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Brian X 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The original Dora show was stupid, stupid, stupid -- painfully repetitive crap that somehow managed to not even measure up to some of the most basic children&#039;s books. &lt;/i&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I disagree.  While watching show like Dora, Diego, and Blues Clues makes me want to shoot myself in the head, I can&#039;t deny they&#039;ve had a positive effect on my son.  They&#039;re interactive, keep kids engaged, and do teach them some surprising things.   I remember on my sons 2nd birthday, we pulled into a parking garage, and my son said, â??Look! We&#039;re in a cave!  Echo!  Papa, did you know that bats use echovucation to see in the dark.â?  It turned out he had learned that from one of those horribly repetitive Diego sequences. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian X </p>
<blockquote><p><i>The original Dora show was stupid, stupid, stupid &#8212; painfully repetitive crap that somehow managed to not even measure up to some of the most basic children&#8217;s books. </i> </p></blockquote>
<p>I disagree.  While watching show like Dora, Diego, and Blues Clues makes me want to shoot myself in the head, I can&#8217;t deny they&#8217;ve had a positive effect on my son.  They&#8217;re interactive, keep kids engaged, and do teach them some surprising things.   I remember on my sons 2nd birthday, we pulled into a parking garage, and my son said, â??Look! We&#8217;re in a cave!  Echo!  Papa, did you know that bats use echovucation to see in the dark.â?  It turned out he had learned that from one of those horribly repetitive Diego sequences. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian X		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can I be brutally honest about one thing? I want to at least hope that there&#039;s some upgrade in the programming. The original Dora show was stupid, stupid, stupid -- painfully repetitive crap that somehow managed to not even measure up to some of the most basic children&#039;s books. There is an astonishing amount of potential in that character that has never even come slightly close to being realized.

In conclusion, bring the monkey back and lose the shoes -- give the girl, you know, some boots. Flat heels. I don&#039;t much care about the clothes. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I be brutally honest about one thing? I want to at least hope that there&#8217;s some upgrade in the programming. The original Dora show was stupid, stupid, stupid &#8212; painfully repetitive crap that somehow managed to not even measure up to some of the most basic children&#8217;s books. There is an astonishing amount of potential in that character that has never even come slightly close to being realized.</p>
<p>In conclusion, bring the monkey back and lose the shoes &#8212; give the girl, you know, some boots. Flat heels. I don&#8217;t much care about the clothes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheril R. Kirshenbaum		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheril R. Kirshenbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Come on Greg, to be fair we ought to &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2009/03/dora_revealed.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wait and see&lt;/a&gt; what Dora is up to.

Furthermore, it&#039;s good she lost the monkey.  Sends &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2009/03/the_science_behind_why_chimpan.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the wrong message&lt;/a&gt; to kids!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Greg, to be fair we ought to <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2009/03/dora_revealed.php" rel="nofollow">wait and see</a> what Dora is up to.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it&#8217;s good she lost the monkey.  Sends <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2009/03/the_science_behind_why_chimpan.php" rel="nofollow">the wrong message</a> to kids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Chimp's Raging Id		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Chimp's Raging Id]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Elizabeth &#124; March 20, 2009 11:28 PM&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The new Dora is fine. The old Dora was fine. Swapping the old Dora out for the New Dora is icky. This sends a rather explicit message. Kids who related to the old Dora in part because the old Dora was not a classic hotty cute chick are getting a little elbow in the gut with this change. Thank you Mattel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree. There&#039;s nothing inherently wrong with either image of Dora but there&#039;s definitely something disturbing about the transition from the former to the latter. It comes cross as an affirmation of the Barbified image to which girls are expected to conform - both in body image and behaviour.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Elizabeth | March 20, 2009 11:28 PM</b></p>
<blockquote><p>The new Dora is fine. The old Dora was fine. Swapping the old Dora out for the New Dora is icky. This sends a rather explicit message. Kids who related to the old Dora in part because the old Dora was not a classic hotty cute chick are getting a little elbow in the gut with this change. Thank you Mattel.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with either image of Dora but there&#8217;s definitely something disturbing about the transition from the former to the latter. It comes cross as an affirmation of the Barbified image to which girls are expected to conform &#8211; both in body image and behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JosÃ©		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JosÃ©]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are we sure they&#039;re actually dumping the old Dora?  My guess is that they&#039;re going to keep the old Dora that&#039;s marketed towards preschool kids intact, and are just creating a parallel Dora marketed towards older girls, which wouldn&#039;t be a bad thing.  

I watch more Dora and Diego than is healthy for an adult (I have a two and a half year old boy who&#039;s nuts for both of them), and the series are so intertwined that I don&#039;t think they could update Dora without updating Diego as well, or abandoning Diego altogether.  I can&#039;t find evidence that they&#039;re doing either.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we sure they&#8217;re actually dumping the old Dora?  My guess is that they&#8217;re going to keep the old Dora that&#8217;s marketed towards preschool kids intact, and are just creating a parallel Dora marketed towards older girls, which wouldn&#8217;t be a bad thing.  </p>
<p>I watch more Dora and Diego than is healthy for an adult (I have a two and a half year old boy who&#8217;s nuts for both of them), and the series are so intertwined that I don&#8217;t think they could update Dora without updating Diego as well, or abandoning Diego altogether.  I can&#8217;t find evidence that they&#8217;re doing either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/20/the-verdict-on-the-new-dora-th/#comment-532942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There will be little kids with little eyeballs in them.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be little kids with little eyeballs in them.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
