<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Bible as Ethnography ~ 03 ~  Sometimes a Snake is Just a Snake.  But not in this case&#8230;.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen Moore		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Khan, that&#039;s been my interpretation of the expulsion form Eden, but given Greg&#039;s analysis above I know wonder how the two interpretations would fit together (if indeed they would).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khan, that&#8217;s been my interpretation of the expulsion form Eden, but given Greg&#8217;s analysis above I know wonder how the two interpretations would fit together (if indeed they would).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: khan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Idle thought: was being forced to leave the garden and work in the fields some sort of folk tale of going from hunter-gatherer to farmer?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idle thought: was being forced to leave the garden and work in the fields some sort of folk tale of going from hunter-gatherer to farmer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mark		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So Johnny Appleseed was really God making sure there were enough magic trees around so he could travel without worrying about running out of life-preserving fruit? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Johnny Appleseed was really God making sure there were enough magic trees around so he could travel without worrying about running out of life-preserving fruit? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ouchimoo		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ouchimoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; The role of Genesis 3 seems to be two part, from a male perspective: 1) find a way to blame women for something really bad, and 2) work out a justification for sexual control of women and thus, indirectly for reproductive rights&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes which would make sense to remove Lilith from the bible if you plan to keep your women-stock in check. 

BTW thank you for speaking at the Bell Museum for Darwin Day. All the speakers did great!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> The role of Genesis 3 seems to be two part, from a male perspective: 1) find a way to blame women for something really bad, and 2) work out a justification for sexual control of women and thus, indirectly for reproductive rights</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes which would make sense to remove Lilith from the bible if you plan to keep your women-stock in check. </p>
<p>BTW thank you for speaking at the Bell Museum for Darwin Day. All the speakers did great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Romeo Vitelli		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romeo Vitelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/02/13/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so-1/#comment-530940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The only thing that is clear about this story is that it, the story, is heavily clothed in euphemism. &quot;

Heretic!  Don&#039;t you know that Genesis &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; be taken literally?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only thing that is clear about this story is that it, the story, is heavily clothed in euphemism. &#8221;</p>
<p>Heretic!  Don&#8217;t you know that Genesis <i>must</i> be taken literally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
