Comments on: Franken-Coleman Senate Race Recount: Restart

By: Argon

Argon — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:33:29 +0000

Don’t blame me. I voted for Wellstone (back in ’90).

Hmm… I’m still cheesed that Bachmann won. I sent Tinklenberg a check after Bachmann’s “investigate congress for disloyalty” meltdown.

By: Moon

Moon — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:13:24 +0000

Smarmy Bastard.

By: Monica

Monica — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:52:31 +0000

Smarmy Bastard.

By: itzac

itzac — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:02:36 +0000

At this stage it’s clear Coleman is less interested in winning the race and more concerned with keeping one more Democrat out of the senate. How very magnanimous of him.

By: Zeno

Zeno — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:51:20 +0000

I remember when Coleman urged Franken to concede the election and save Minnesota from undergoing a recount (which was going to happen automatically because the election was so close). Coleman wanted to spare his state the expense and delay of a further election contest. Coleman said that he would concede if he were in Franken’s position of trailing by more than 200 votes. He’s been in just that position for a couple of weeks now and I guess he’s changed his mind about sparing Minnesota further expense and delay.

Smarmy bastard. I’ll be glad when the court confirms his defeat.

By: Virgil Samms

Virgil Samms — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:36:23 +0000

The people of Minnesota are currently under-represented in the U.S. Senate. Why don’t they sue Norm Coleman for bringing this situation about?