Comments on: More on the 12.9 k impact https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/ Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:47:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: Tim https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528980 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:47:41 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528980 Well, at least this story is better than the coverage on CNN, which doesn’t name anyone from the article and mistakenly places it in Nature rather than Science. Yeesh.

]]> By: george.w https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528979 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:21:00 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528979

Witness the new nanodiamond solitaire ring… for the romantic electron microscopist in your life… (Cue dramatic music and black & white diamond commercial style)

“Oh, honey, you shouldn’t have!”

]]> By: Mike https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528978 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:13:49 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528978 Wait until DeBeers hears about THIS!

]]> By: george.w https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528977 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:57:27 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/01/02/more-on-the-129-k-impact/#comment-528977 Whew! At least it was twelve thousand years ago, so nothing like that could happen now!

]]>