Comments on: Stunning Politics (Adult Content)

By: the real cmf

the real cmf — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:32:35 +0000

*sigh* even the girls zoom in on tits and ass…tummies, feet,sturdy examples of bi-pedalism,ossa coxae that show promise of actualy enabling their owner to live through childbirth– all co-opted by the scathing sexual eye of American prudes…

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:06:31 +0000

Actually, Mike, I think she’s supposed to be masculine because she looks neither modest nor sexualized. I don’t particularly want to have a conversation with the photographer, but I do think he captured the essence of a professional model here. It’s that striking combination of pliability and detachment.blf, appreciate what you’ve got, please, and pity those of us who live in a land where breasts are more acceptable if they’re being hacked apart in a slasher movie. The movie, of course, becomes less acceptable.

By: Wes

Wes — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:26:06 +0000

Whilst I’m not French, I live and work in France. I could have probably viewed this post at work and nobody (of either sex) would have batted an eye. For feck’s sake, it’s less pornographic than some of the advertising posters!Posted by: blf | April 11, 2008 8:02 PM

Keep in mind how prudish, insecure, and fearful of the female form many Americans are. Let’s not forget that America is the country which was thrown into a nationwide uproar over a single tit flashed for a split second at the Super Bowl. Many Americans automatically and unthinkingly equate images of the female body with filthiness and lewdness. Very, very different from France.

By: Mike Haubrich, FCD

Mike Haubrich, FCD — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:22:23 +0000

Okay, so since she has smallish breasts she is not feminine?But, I am in favor of as many rattings as I can get, so thanks for the picture, Greg.It’s artistic, not pornographic.

By: blf

blf — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:02:17 +0000

Whilst I’m not French, I live and work in France. I could have probably viewed this post at work and nobody (of either sex) would have batted an eye. For feck’s sake, it’s less pornographic than some of the advertising posters!

By: Greg Laden

Greg Laden — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:18:49 +0000

The reason I did not put this below the fold was for a technical reason that I have realized does not exist. Thus it is adjusted. So everyone can go home and lock your doors and windows now. Nothing to see here.

By: Biochemist

Biochemist — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:37:09 +0000

I agree with Napoleon, in that I think this post was all about the rattings.Who doesn’t want more rattings?If anybody has some rattings they don’t want, send them my way!

By: Stephanie Z

Stephanie Z — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:34:44 +0000

ML, I think the only appropriate response to someone seeing it over your shoulder is a shrug, followed by, “Sorry, I was reading about French politics. I should have known.”

By: the real cmf

the real cmf — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:04:41 +0000

“there is principle, fear, indignation, socio-political mutual masturbation, and then there is reality.”The reality is that we live in a politicized body. That body masculine is deemed worthless, and meanigless, but mostly “controllable” as long as it is within the purview of several women at the same time–these women who sit in judgement, and provided that the male ‘phallus’ is diminished in stature.For those of us who had the great fortune of viewing this female form while in public, those of us who are male no doubt were viewed as naughty lab rats by those who seek only the confirmation bias of ” see, men are all pigs” without even the cursory decency of any onlooker to voice the question the image may well have caused in their own heads, and if those onlookers were female, likely had in their own ( female projection of desire onto males).Also, not how one person up there said that the womans genitals were showing? It is typical to ‘infer’ female genitals–especially BY females–even if those genitals are not exposed.But no one, ever in these discussion ever mentions those wonderful ground hugging wide feet, or her positively functionally long arms juxtaposed against capable hips… and why is it that women wear clothes? Lest they become boring to the eye, or ‘masculine…’.That being said, i see why Sarcozy left his wife….;-)

By: Napoleon Z. Dworkin

Napoleon Z. Dworkin — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:24:02 +0000

You sexist PIG! I would imagine the world would have had its fill by now of oogling naked women, but NOOO. we just can’t get enough of that here on Mr. Ladens blog!This woman is despicable as a billboard tool, and you are obviously going for rattings, pondering to those juvenistic male impulses. This sort of pondering to the emotional and uncontrollable male urges is exactly why rape happens all the time, somewhere in the worlds.Someone out there is probably looking at this image and then contemplating a kidnapping, or worse, some other deviant typical male behavior, like masterbatting under there desk, while perpetrutating the crime of violence of thinking about women as sexual beings, or gawking at their secretaries!!Shame on you who are supposed to be sciencists.