<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Does Apple Throttle The Competition, Microsoft Style?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Armchair Dissident		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/#comment-4657</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armchair Dissident]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/#comment-4657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joe, I too saw the comment from Dave Hyatt in that comments threads, but his response isn&#039;t really that satisfactory.First of all, he&#039;s saying that Apple doesn&#039;t make those API&#039;s public because they expose the workings of WebKit that&#039;s subject to change.  That&#039;s a Good Thing(tm).  But if that&#039;s the case, and if regression testing is a problem, then the essential question then becomes: why is Safari using it.Surely it can&#039;t be difficult for Apple to implement a policy to say, &quot;if it ain&#039;t it the book, you ain&#039;t using it&quot;.  I know that I do that with libraries that I write.  If I haven&#039;t documented how something works, nobody gets to play with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I too saw the comment from Dave Hyatt in that comments threads, but his response isn&#8217;t really that satisfactory.First of all, he&#8217;s saying that Apple doesn&#8217;t make those API&#8217;s public because they expose the workings of WebKit that&#8217;s subject to change.  That&#8217;s a Good Thing(tm).  But if that&#8217;s the case, and if regression testing is a problem, then the essential question then becomes: why is Safari using it.Surely it can&#8217;t be difficult for Apple to implement a policy to say, &#8220;if it ain&#8217;t it the book, you ain&#8217;t using it&#8221;.  I know that I do that with libraries that I write.  If I haven&#8217;t documented how something works, nobody gets to play with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/#comment-4656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/03/03/does-apple-throttle-the-compet/#comment-4656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;but possibly too fair, to Apple&lt;/i&gt;I followed the link and there was an interested discussion in the comments. One comment appeared to explain from Apple&#039;s perpective why this was done. Maybe there&#039;s reason for his fairness?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but possibly too fair, to Apple</i>I followed the link and there was an interested discussion in the comments. One comment appeared to explain from Apple&#8217;s perpective why this was done. Maybe there&#8217;s reason for his fairness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
