<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sunday Script-Yours	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/#comment-4681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/#comment-4681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hank: If you vote for Python then you are voting for Python being thought of as a scripting language....  You have a conundrum.I think of a scripting language as having two features:  1: It is interpreted and 2: it can script things, i.e., is aware of high level things (windows states, for example) and thus can be used to run other programs.  If C (not C+, C#, but C) was interpreted (one could in theory build an interpreter, I suppose) it might not be a scripting language unless you provided a high end library.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank: If you vote for Python then you are voting for Python being thought of as a scripting language&#8230;.  You have a conundrum.I think of a scripting language as having two features:  1: It is interpreted and 2: it can script things, i.e., is aware of high level things (windows states, for example) and thus can be used to run other programs.  If C (not C+, C#, but C) was interpreted (one could in theory build an interpreter, I suppose) it might not be a scripting language unless you provided a high end library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hank		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/#comment-4680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/03/02/sunday-scriptyours/#comment-4680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if I would classify Python as a scripting language per se, even though it&#039;s interpreted.Or perhaps it&#039;s just an effect of the current state of interpreted languages that a highly elegant language like python can be considered a scripting language.No prize for guessing where my vote ended up!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I would classify Python as a scripting language per se, even though it&#8217;s interpreted.Or perhaps it&#8217;s just an effect of the current state of interpreted languages that a highly elegant language like python can be considered a scripting language.No prize for guessing where my vote ended up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
