https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/ Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:42:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4350 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:42:23 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4350 “I want Nader in a cabinet position.”I want that too, but I want to make damn dure that cabinet has NO formaldehyde in it; and safety hinges…because right now, it looks like he has come unhinged, and is set to steal more votes from OBAMA.

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4349 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:08:34 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4349 Scotty, sorry, our server is acting strange so sometimes the posts time out then when you hit some button again there ends up being two of them.Personally, I put Nader in the “Jerry Brown” category. Great concept, but the moment he is president Canada invades.I want Nader in a cabinet position.

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4348 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:39:25 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4348 Sorry, I am not moocking you, I’m having internet problems.

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4347 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:37:42 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4347 I understand your point, but as I said, that argument just doesn’t fly with me. We can argue the point, but in the end we’re just going to have to agree to disagree.Instead, I was asking for other reasons why Nader would not be the best choice for president given the current choices.Thanks for any help you can offer,Scotty B

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4346 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:35:52 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4346 I understand your point, but as I said, that argument just doesn’t fly with me. We can argue the point, but in the end we’re just going to have to agree to disagree.Instead, I was asking for other reasons why Nader would not be the best choice for president given the current choices.Thanks for any help you can offer,Scotty B

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4345 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:12:34 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4345 Scotty: It is the IF in your argument that makes you dead wrong.Ground yourself. Get in touch with reality. Imagine the next election between a democrat and a republican and it is very very close, but the democrat is going to win by several tens of thousands of votes. Now imagine any third party candidate, no matter how good they may be, taking away more democratic votes than republic votes and thus causing the election to be won by the republican.Get it?

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4344 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:10:21 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4344 Scotty: It is the IF in your argument that makes you dead wrong.Ground yourself. Get in touch with reality. Imagine the next election between a democrat and a republican and it is very very close, but the democrat is going to win by several tens of thousands of votes. Now imagine any third party candidate, no matter how good they may be, taking away more democratic votes than republic votes and thus causing the election to be won by the republican.Get it?

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4343 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:55:31 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4343 Can someone give me some good reasons not to vote for Nader? All I ever seem to hear is that he causes Democrats to lose elections, but that argument doesn’t fly with me. If the Democratic candidates were doing it right, they should be winning by a landslide regardless of whether Nader is running.

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4342 Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:54:15 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4342 i just read thomas’ comment, and just wanted to give a a little high five here, because he’s right. he is also one of many who have turned their backs on the status quo because of this war. so greg has real reason to lament. there are a lot of us.

]]> https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4341 Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:45:44 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/24/get-your-no-to-nader-blog-badg/#comment-4341 love nader. i say hell yeah to nader, and thank you for fucking up that which sorely needs fucking up.

]]>