<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Artificial and Natural Selection in Cosmos	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:53:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Polymath		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/#comment-3981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polymath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/#comment-3981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bravo!  As is said there, evolution is a historical fact, just as gravity is a fact.  The theory of evolution is analagous to the theory of gravity.  (Or should I say, theories.  Both Newton&#039;s and Einstein&#039;s are regularly used..)Like the theory of gravity, it explains and predicts the actions of the effect it describes.  But even if Darwin&#039;s theory of evoluton were to be utterly demolished tomorrow, we&#039;d still need &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; theory of evolution to replace it.  Just as physicists, aware of fundamental flaws in both Newton&#039;s and Einstein&#039;s theories, are looking for a still-better one.(Yes, I know that modern evolutionary theory different from Darwin&#039;s formulation in several important ways, but I think it&#039;s still fundamentally his.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo!  As is said there, evolution is a historical fact, just as gravity is a fact.  The theory of evolution is analagous to the theory of gravity.  (Or should I say, theories.  Both Newton&#8217;s and Einstein&#8217;s are regularly used..)Like the theory of gravity, it explains and predicts the actions of the effect it describes.  But even if Darwin&#8217;s theory of evoluton were to be utterly demolished tomorrow, we&#8217;d still need <em>some</em> theory of evolution to replace it.  Just as physicists, aware of fundamental flaws in both Newton&#8217;s and Einstein&#8217;s theories, are looking for a still-better one.(Yes, I know that modern evolutionary theory different from Darwin&#8217;s formulation in several important ways, but I think it&#8217;s still fundamentally his.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: laurisa		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/#comment-3980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/02/15/artificial-and-natural-selecti/#comment-3980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Humans encourage the selection of some varieties, and deselects others...,&quot; the man says.  Talk to me about selection in humans.  Have we domesticated our own species?  Btw, f*ck James Watson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Humans encourage the selection of some varieties, and deselects others&#8230;,&#8221; the man says.  Talk to me about selection in humans.  Have we domesticated our own species?  Btw, f*ck James Watson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
