Comments on: Poor Bill Foster Reaps What He Sows

By: mark

mark — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:12:11 +0000

I think Foster is being disingenuous in his penultimate paragraph–I suspect he would throw a fit if a kid brought a Bible into social studies class and used it to support some viewpoint and the teacher responded by informing the kid that that section of the Bible was written hundreds of years later than the kid claims. Or if the kid tried to use it in social studies class to argue in favor of Creationism only to have the teacher explain that the Bible is not an accurate source for the Creationist contentions.

By: Felicia Gilljam

Felicia Gilljam — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:46:11 +0000

Indeed, the most important mistake Bill makes is calling evolution an ideology in the first place. He, and everyone else who does that, needs to be called on it and made to explain if he also thinks that the theory of gravitation is normative and that people who believe in it refuse to step into airplanes or elevators.

By: chezjake

chezjake — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:33:10 +0000

Bill! Correct! Hitler, a very twisted guy, twisted Darwinism.Greg, I think you missed a very big opportunity in your follow up to this. I really think that Bill Foster deserves a "Bill, you're a very twisted fellow too, the way you try to twist modern evolutionary theory into a social ideology!"