<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Florida:  Evolution could be coming to a classroom near you&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/11/florida-evolution-could-be-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/11/florida-evolution-could-be-com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald Cote		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/11/florida-evolution-could-be-com/#comment-2767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Cote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/01/11/florida-evolution-could-be-com/#comment-2767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The clue is that &quot;50 educators met.. on new science standards&quot;. Educators are paid to tow the party line and teach what they are mandated to teach. This does not portend to a balanced, impartial assessment. It is called &quot;job security&quot;, akin to the fox tending the hen house.How can Daigle make a case for shortchanging students when the revised standards would give them a better understanding of an important contemporary controversy that would only provide them with a real lfe learning experience and the luxury of being a participant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The clue is that &#8220;50 educators met.. on new science standards&#8221;. Educators are paid to tow the party line and teach what they are mandated to teach. This does not portend to a balanced, impartial assessment. It is called &#8220;job security&#8221;, akin to the fox tending the hen house.How can Daigle make a case for shortchanging students when the revised standards would give them a better understanding of an important contemporary controversy that would only provide them with a real lfe learning experience and the luxury of being a participant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
