<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Robert Wright: How cooperation (eventually) trumps conflict	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/10/robert-wright-how-cooperation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/10/robert-wright-how-cooperation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MattXIV		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2008/01/10/robert-wright-how-cooperation/#comment-2701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattXIV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/01/10/robert-wright-how-cooperation/#comment-2701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The blurb misses the best thing about non-zero sum games - that people will cooperate under then even in the absence of altruism or empathy, since it is in their own interest to do so.  Adam Smith said it best:&lt;blockquote&gt;It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own neccessities but of their advantages.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thus, even if appeals to decency or justice fall to make the case for peace, the appeal to self-interest persists - theoretically, there is always a negotiated outcome that&#039;s better than warfare for both parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blurb misses the best thing about non-zero sum games &#8211; that people will cooperate under then even in the absence of altruism or empathy, since it is in their own interest to do so.  Adam Smith said it best:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own neccessities but of their advantages.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thus, even if appeals to decency or justice fall to make the case for peace, the appeal to self-interest persists &#8211; theoretically, there is always a negotiated outcome that&#8217;s better than warfare for both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
