<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: National Geographic&#8217;s Top Ten Archaeology Stories of 2007	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/#comment-2226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/#comment-2226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good point, Son.  Nonetheless, I would wish NGS to be above unadulterated beauty pageants.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Son.  Nonetheless, I would wish NGS to be above unadulterated beauty pageants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Son of Priam		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/#comment-2225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Son of Priam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/12/26/national-geographics-top-ten-a/#comment-2225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg said: &quot;...the finds that National Geographic sees as most important...&quot;From National Geographic: &quot;... this year&#039;s most popular archaeology stories from National Geographic News.&quot;That means these are just the most viewed or emailed NatGeo stories of 2007, not the finds or research of 2007 that NatGeo finds most important.  Big difference.  That&#039;s like going to Yahoo! News&#039; &quot;Most Popular&quot; page and claiming that Yahoo! has deemed those stories most important.That being said, most of these stories are arguably among the least important of the year.  My top pick is probably the findings about the start of urbanization at Tell Brak.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg said: &#8220;&#8230;the finds that National Geographic sees as most important&#8230;&#8221;From National Geographic: &#8220;&#8230; this year&#8217;s most popular archaeology stories from National Geographic News.&#8221;That means these are just the most viewed or emailed NatGeo stories of 2007, not the finds or research of 2007 that NatGeo finds most important.  Big difference.  That&#8217;s like going to Yahoo! News&#8217; &#8220;Most Popular&#8221; page and claiming that Yahoo! has deemed those stories most important.That being said, most of these stories are arguably among the least important of the year.  My top pick is probably the findings about the start of urbanization at Tell Brak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
