<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Big Surprise: Bushies Are Bushies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/11/big-surprise-bushies-are-bushi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/11/big-surprise-bushies-are-bushi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zach Alexander		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/12/11/big-surprise-bushies-are-bushi/#comment-1691</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Alexander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/12/11/big-surprise-bushies-are-bushi/#comment-1691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure he&#039;s onto something, but I don&#039;t understand why he didn&#039;t (as appears to be the case) gather other data than just support of Bush. It suggests he&#039;s more interested in making a political statement than actually finding out something interesting about political psychology.Also, he seems to overstate the results, by saying people&#039;s attitudes &quot;depend&quot; on their feelings towards Bush, which suggests a relationship of causality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s onto something, but I don&#8217;t understand why he didn&#8217;t (as appears to be the case) gather other data than just support of Bush. It suggests he&#8217;s more interested in making a political statement than actually finding out something interesting about political psychology.Also, he seems to overstate the results, by saying people&#8217;s attitudes &#8220;depend&#8221; on their feelings towards Bush, which suggests a relationship of causality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
