<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Bible as Ethnography ~ 03 ~  Sometimes a Snake is Just a Snake.  But not in this case&#8230;.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Moopheus		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/#comment-550215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moopheus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/#comment-550215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Remember, the tree providing the forbidden fruit is the tree of knowledge.&quot;

The text, at least in the translation I have at hand (the JPS Tanakh), calls it the &quot;tree of knowledge of good and bad.&quot; So presumably the knowledge is specifically moral knowledge, that is, eating the fruit is a loss of moral innocence, becoming adults, which I guess would include sexual knowledge.

&quot;it is reasonable to suggest that God had been living off the land, and produced the Garden of Eden and humans to upgrade to irrigation&quot;

You mean we weren&#039;t genetically engineered by the Annunaki to mine gold for them to take back to Nibiru?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remember, the tree providing the forbidden fruit is the tree of knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>The text, at least in the translation I have at hand (the JPS Tanakh), calls it the &#8220;tree of knowledge of good and bad.&#8221; So presumably the knowledge is specifically moral knowledge, that is, eating the fruit is a loss of moral innocence, becoming adults, which I guess would include sexual knowledge.</p>
<p>&#8220;it is reasonable to suggest that God had been living off the land, and produced the Garden of Eden and humans to upgrade to irrigation&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean we weren&#8217;t genetically engineered by the Annunaki to mine gold for them to take back to Nibiru?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nathan Myers		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/#comment-550214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/29/the-bible-as-ethnography-03-so/#comment-550214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The specific-tree theme is practically universal.  Often it&#039;s identified with the &quot;world axis&quot; that the stars rotate around.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specific-tree theme is practically universal.  Often it&#8217;s identified with the &#8220;world axis&#8221; that the stars rotate around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
