<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Bible as Ethnography ~ 01 ~ Introduction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550210</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Formanek		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Formanek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Moses is a royal Egyptian name, like Thutmoses etc. 
(I believe I read that in Freud&#039;s _Moses and Monotheism._)
That comparison could not be made before the translation of the Rosetta Stone in the early 19th century]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moses is a royal Egyptian name, like Thutmoses etc.<br />
(I believe I read that in Freud&#8217;s _Moses and Monotheism._)<br />
That comparison could not be made before the translation of the Rosetta Stone in the early 19th century</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Isaac		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a nice theory, but the Israelite religion around the time of the formation of the Bible had a strong connection with the Ancient Near East (Read: Iraq) - just as strong if not stronger than it did with Egypt and Africa. Mesopotamian civilization goes back to at least 3000 BCE.

In Mesopotamian culture there is a large pantheon - the gods interact with the kings (who certainly exist) but are clearly separate from him. The gods created, but are separate from, humanity.

The Bible makes much more sense as a polemic against kingship than it does as a reading where God is an actual king.

Read some Sumerian literature (Gilgamesh stories, Atrahasis epic) and you will quickly see that the Biblical author shares a common history and culture with those authors. I&#039;d be happy to give you some references if you&#039;d like.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice theory, but the Israelite religion around the time of the formation of the Bible had a strong connection with the Ancient Near East (Read: Iraq) &#8211; just as strong if not stronger than it did with Egypt and Africa. Mesopotamian civilization goes back to at least 3000 BCE.</p>
<p>In Mesopotamian culture there is a large pantheon &#8211; the gods interact with the kings (who certainly exist) but are clearly separate from him. The gods created, but are separate from, humanity.</p>
<p>The Bible makes much more sense as a polemic against kingship than it does as a reading where God is an actual king.</p>
<p>Read some Sumerian literature (Gilgamesh stories, Atrahasis epic) and you will quickly see that the Biblical author shares a common history and culture with those authors. I&#8217;d be happy to give you some references if you&#8217;d like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John S. Wilkins		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S. Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/27/the-bible-as-ethnography-01-in/#comment-550207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg, I have a similar set of ideas. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/03/the_topic_of_the_evolution_of.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/03/god_and_the_natural_history_of.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/11/explaining_religion_4_wolves_a.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I have a similar set of ideas. See <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/03/the_topic_of_the_evolution_of.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/03/god_and_the_natural_history_of.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/11/explaining_religion_4_wolves_a.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
