<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why do people laugh at creationists?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/26/stumblevideo-why-do-people-lau/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/26/stumblevideo-why-do-people-lau/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 6EQUJ5		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/26/stumblevideo-why-do-people-lau/#comment-927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[6EQUJ5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/26/stumblevideo-why-do-people-lau/#comment-927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice job.If the ice chunk was moving at cometary speed (30 km/s), then almost certainly it would be native to the solar system. A rogue from interstellar space -- this nitwit&#039;s claim -- would have hyperbolic velocity with respect to the Sun, with no real limit on the &#039;excess&#039; (hyperbolic minus parabolic), and so would be considerably more energetic than the analysis given.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job.If the ice chunk was moving at cometary speed (30 km/s), then almost certainly it would be native to the solar system. A rogue from interstellar space &#8212; this nitwit&#8217;s claim &#8212; would have hyperbolic velocity with respect to the Sun, with no real limit on the &#8216;excess&#8217; (hyperbolic minus parabolic), and so would be considerably more energetic than the analysis given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
