<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Religious Scholors to Debate Flying Spaghetti Monster	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From an article on CNN

Gavin Van Horn promises in his abstract to explore how, &quot;in a carnivalesque fashion, the Flying Spaghetti Monster elevates the low (the bodily, the material, the inorganic) to bring down the high (the sacred, the religiously dogmatic, the culturally authoritative).&quot;

From my perspective FSM uses the high (a well developed sense of satire) to skewer the low (pompous, self righteous, unsupportable dogmatism)

but then I happily align myself with the Patafarians ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an article on CNN</p>
<p>Gavin Van Horn promises in his abstract to explore how, &#8220;in a carnivalesque fashion, the Flying Spaghetti Monster elevates the low (the bodily, the material, the inorganic) to bring down the high (the sacred, the religiously dogmatic, the culturally authoritative).&#8221;</p>
<p>From my perspective FSM uses the high (a well developed sense of satire) to skewer the low (pompous, self righteous, unsupportable dogmatism)</p>
<p>but then I happily align myself with the Patafarians </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blake Stacey		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Stacey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, it&#039;s great and all, but I found what the theology students were planning to say (at least as reported by the AP) to be a little, well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=393&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;batty&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s great and all, but I found what the theology students were planning to say (at least as reported by the AP) to be a little, well, <a href="http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=393" rel="nofollow">batty</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russell		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Who says a real god would not show himself through a seeming act of satire? How can we limit the mechanisms of a deity? If an angel can speak to Mohamed in a cave, or if gold plates can be translated by Joseph Smith using a seeing stone, then why can&#039;t a graduate student inspired to satire be given True Revelation? That seems quite in the FSM&#039;s character! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says a real god would not show himself through a seeming act of satire? How can we limit the mechanisms of a deity? If an angel can speak to Mohamed in a cave, or if gold plates can be translated by Joseph Smith using a seeing stone, then why can&#8217;t a graduate student inspired to satire be given True Revelation? That seems quite in the FSM&#8217;s character! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laelaps		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laelaps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2007/11/16/religious-scholors-to-debate-f/#comment-550177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Curses, you beat me to it. A friend of mine sent that to me just a few minutes ago; I&#039;ll be interested to see what is said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curses, you beat me to it. A friend of mine sent that to me just a few minutes ago; I&#8217;ll be interested to see what is said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
