Sell Your Soul for $5,000
Published by Greg May 20th, 2007 in Creationism in the Classroom, Creationism, CommentaryMinnetonka. Clear lake, ice fishing mecca, headwaters of the Minnehaha, the mystical creek that runs through the Vale of Tawasentha.
And home of some of the wackiest creationists on record. Don’t get me started.
Among the wackiest is Julie Haberle, her exploits previously chronicled on this blog, and founder of whosyourcreator.com.
Whosyourcreatordotcom is offering a $5,000 reward for anyone who can write a
a four-part legal Opinion on the subject of teaching the theory of evolution and teaching
the theory of creation in the public schools. The first part will summarize the state of the law today regarding the banning of
any critical analysis of the theory of evolution as well as the banning of teaching the theory of creation in the public schools.
The Supreme Court Epperson and Edwards cases shall be considered. The recent Kitzmiller vs. Dover case is instructive
only as an example of how NOT to construct the length, clarity, topics and insight of an Opinion. A Humanist judge will obsess
ever whether a belief or theory is Christian while ignoring the religious implications of teaching the theory of evolution. This first
part shall be comprised of a maximum of two pages with a limit of 400 words – Truth requires clarity and thus brevity.
…. and on and on with additional drivil. If you want to read it, you can find whosyourcreatordotcom on the web somewhere. I seem to have lost the link…
(BTW, sorry if the formatting on that is crazy in some browsers … that’s how it comes off the whosyourcreatordotcomwebsite and I’m not inclined to fix it)
For $5,000, this may be worth a try … But you’ve got to hurry. The contest ends “no later than 30 days from the formal announcement on August 27th, 2007.” I suppose in the mean time they’ll be raising the contest money.
Whosyourcreatordotcom has a forum, feel free to go and harass them. It’s fun for a few minutes.






Hmmm, Bart Simpson only got $5 for his.
Fun stuff. Science as unconstitutional infringement on free exercise, because it runs counter to their religious doctrine? Somebody ought to tell those folks that their tactic went out with Pope Urban. Even the Catholic Church has had sense enough to apologize for using it on Galileo.