Search
Recent Comments
- Mordred Gravehaven on The Magic of Reality
- Greg Laden on Minnesota Voters (sometimes)
- Uncle Glenny on Minnesota Voters (sometimes)
- Greg Laden on Women abusing and killing men
- Greg Laden on Women abusing and killing men
Categories
Archive
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- June 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Meta








A replacement for Hitch. A little more time on the sticks and pow! We can have a new horsewoman of the Apocalypse.
Michael Shermer’s “The Science of Good and Evil” does a great job of elaborating on these core ideas. Of course, I would argue that the burden of proof is not on non believers to disprove the claim, it is on believers to prove it.
Being religious doesn’t make you more or less likely to commit a crime. Humans have had laws and morals long before the advent of any of the abrahamic religions and laws and morals exist and have existed without the influence of any of the abrahamic religions around the world. Many immoral things have been done not just by christians but in the name of christianity and in parts of the world, aspects of the old and new testament are still used to justify war, genocide, suppression of women, slavery, homophobia, child abuse and countless other actions that the vast majority of us consider immoral.
Before any of us need to worry about proving we can be good without god, religious people need to prove that being religious makes one moral.
In the book “Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind” by Donald Johanson, the author and his colleagues propose an idea regarding human evolution. It was basically a web. Larger brain size requires more time to learn to use the brain, hence longer childhood, hence longer care required. More time spent on child care requires support from others in the group, and longer childhood leads to play to learn to use the brain, so we need rules that everyone in the society follows. This, I think, is the evolutionary basis for morality. Additional factors in the web were female receptiveness to sex, decrease number of children, and possibly others.
I apologize for the incompleteness of the above. The web was a fascinating diagram that I would open up to and just follow the arrows.